Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33075095›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

A multiplex biomarker assay improves the diagnostic performance of HE4 and CA125 in ovarian tumor patients.

Pia Leandersson, Anna Åkesson, Ingrid Hedenfalk, Susanne Malander, Christer Borgfeldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A multimodal MRI radiomics model for distinguishing borderline from malignant ovarian epithelial tumors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pia LeanderssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Reproductive Medicine Center, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Malmo, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6180-0111
Anna ÅkessonClinical Studies Sweden-Forum South, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Ingrid HedenfalkDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Susanne MalanderDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Christer BorgfeldtDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurvival in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains poor. Most patients are diagnosed in late stages. Early diagnosis increases the chance of survival. We used the proximity extension assay from Olink Proteomics to search for new protein biomarkers with the potential to improve the diagnostic performance of CA125 and HE4 in patients with ovarian tumors. MATERIAL AND

methodsPlasma samples were obtained from 180 women with ovarian tumors; 30 cases of benign tumor, 28 cases with borderline tumors, 25 early EOC cases (FIGO stage I) and 97 advanced EOC cases (FIGO stages II-IV). Proteins were measured using the Olink® Oncology II and Inflammation panels. For statistical analyses, patients were categorized into benign tumors versus cancer and benign tumors versus borderline + cancer, respectively.

resultsWe analyzed 177 biomarkers. Thirty-four proteins had ROC AUC > 0.7 for discrimination between benign tumors and cancer. Fifteen proteins had ROC AUC > 0.7 for discrimination between benign tumors and borderline tumors + cancer. HE4 ranked highest for both comparisons. A reference model with HE4, CA125 and age (AUC 0.838 for benign tumors vs. cancer and AUC 0.770 for benign tumors vs. borderline tumors + cancer) was compared to the reference model with the addition of each of the remaining proteins with AUC > 0.7. ITGAV was the only individual biomarker found to improve diagnostic performance of the reference model, to AUC 0.874 for benign tumors vs. cancer and AUC 0.818 for benign tumors vs. borderline tumors + cancer (p < 0.05). Cross-validation and LASSO regression was combined to select multiple biomarker combinations. The best performing model for discrimination between benign tumors and borderline tumors + cancer was a 6-biomarker combination (HE4, CA125, ITGAV, CXCL1, CEACAM1, IL-10RB) and age (AUC 0.868, sensitivity 0.86 and specificity 0.82, p = 0.016 for comparison with the reference model).

conclusionHE4 was the best performing individual biomarker for discrimination between benign ovarian tumors and EOC including borderline tumors. The addition of other carcinogenesis-related biomarkers in a multiplex biomarker panel can improve the diagnostic performance of the established biomarkers HE4 and CA125.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsRegression AnalysisROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenMembrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, humanWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2WFDC2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33075095
PMCPMC7571712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.