Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33075056›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Evaluation of a facility-based inspection tool to assess lymphedema management services in Vietnam.

Do Trung Dung, Vu Thi Lam Binh, Caitlin M Worrell, Molly Brady, Victoria Walsh, Aya Yajima, Zeina Sifri, LeAnne M Fox

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Do Trung DungNational Institute of Malariology, Parasitology, and Entomology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Vu Thi Lam BinhNational Institute of Malariology, Parasitology, and Entomology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Caitlin M WorrellU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0229-6565
Molly BradyRTI International, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Victoria WalshU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Aya YajimaWorld Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Office, Manila, Philippines.
Zeina SifriHelen Keller International, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
LeAnne M FoxU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology · VNHelen Keller International · USRTI International · USWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific · PH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assuring availability of services for patients with lymphedema is required for countries to be validated as having achieved elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF). A direct inspection protocol (DIP) tool, designed to measure the readiness to provide quality lymphedema management services, has recently been developed. The DIP tool includes 14 indicators across six quality themes: trained staff, case management and education materials, water infrastructure, medicines and commodities, patient tracking system, and staff knowledge. We evaluated the use of the tool in Vietnam, where data were needed to inform validation efforts. To apply the tool in Vietnam, we compiled a list of 219 commune health stations (CHS) with known lymphedema patients and conducted a cross-sectional survey in 32 CHS; including 24 in Red River Delta region, 2 in the North Central region, and 6 in the South Central Coast region. The mean facility score, calculated by assigning 1 point per indicator, was 8.8 of 14 points (63%, range 4[29%]-13[93%]). Percentage of surveyed facilities with staff trained in last two years was 0%; availability of lymphedema management guidelines (56%); availability of information, education, and communication materials (16%); reliable improved water infrastructure (94%); availability of antiseptics (81%), antifungals (44%), analgesics or anti-inflammatories (97%), antibiotics (94%); supplies for lymphedema and acute attack management (100%); lymphedema patients recorded in last 12 months (9%); staff knowledge about lymphedema signs/symptoms (63%), lymphedema management strategies (72%), signs/symptoms of acute attacks (81%), and acute attack management strategies (75%). The tool allowed standardized assessment of readiness to provide quality services. Lack of trained health staff, limited patient tracking, and depletion of education materials were identified as challenges and addressed by the national program. Survey data were included in the validation dossier, providing evidence necessary for WHO to validate Vietnam as having eliminated lymphatic filariasis in 2018.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth ServicesHumansLymphedemaMaleMiddle AgedVietnam

Identifiers

PMID33075056
PMCPMC7595627
OpenAlexW3093037876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.