Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33075049›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

The pattern of anthrax at the wildlife-livestock-human interface in Zimbabwe.

Norman L Mukarati, Gift Matope, Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky, Daud N Ndhlovu, Alexandre Caron, Davies M Pfukenyi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. TheMicroorganisms · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Norman L MukaratiDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0002-0150-9170
Gift MatopeDepartment of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary science, University of Zimbabwe, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0002-2615-7394
Michel de Garine-WichatitskyASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ. de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Daud N NdhlovuDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0003-0576-1290
Alexandre CaronASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ. de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Davies M PfukenyiDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0002-1818-5723
University of Zimbabwe · ZWCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthrax is an important but neglected zoonosis in southern Africa and elsewhere which occurs naturally in herbivorous wildlife and livestock. Fatal outbreaks in animals are spaced by potentially extended periods of non-activity during which the bacterium is maintained in soil. The ecology of the pathogen in the multi-host system and the environment is still not fully understood. This study investigated the patterns of anthrax in Zimbabwe in order to better understand the occurrence of disease in susceptible wildlife and livestock and hence its control. The study used available data in governmental reports between 1995 and 2018 and structured interviewer-administered questionnaires of local communities in three porous wildlife-livestock-human interface sites where livestock/wildlife interactions were documented from previous researches. Two non-interface sites were also included for comparison based on known previous anthrax outbreaks. Respondents from non-interface sites had significantly higher odds (χ2 = 23.2, OR = 3.5, 2.1<OR<5.8, p<0.001) of reporting anthrax outbreaks than their counterparts at the interface. Overall 20.0% (74/372) of the respondents reported that some anthrax carcasses were left to dissipate into the environment indicating a risk of environmental contamination. In livestock a total of 214 outbreaks with 2911 losses (mainly cattle) were recorded between 2000 and 2018, while 10 outbreaks with 3171 deaths were noted in wildlife. In humans 99 outbreaks were recorded involving 903 individual cases with 16 fatalities due to enteric infections following the consumption of infected meat between 2010 and 2018. Since its first incidence in wildlife in 2004-2005 in the south-eastern Lowveld of Zimbabwe, anthrax appears to be establishing endemic status along the Zambezi River basin. The disease has expanded spatially affecting 45 (72.6%) of the country's 62 rural districts in a single decade. Thus, robust multi-disciplinary efforts are encouraged for surveillance and disease containment measures to minimize its impact on livestock, wildlife and humans.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsAnimals, WildAnthraxChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLivestockMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultZimbabweZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID33075049
PMCPMC7595623
OpenAlexW3092950703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.