Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33074695›Full record

Trial reportDevelopmental psychology2020

Children's evaluations of individually and structurally based inequalities: The role of status.

Michael T Rizzo, Melanie Killen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Developmental psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Social psychology of education : an international journal · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Developmental origins of anti-Black bias in White children in the United States: Exposure to and beliefs about racial inequality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Promoting Fair and Just School Environments: Developing Inclusive Youth.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Developmental Science Perspective on Social Inequality.Current directions in psychological science · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael T RizzoNew York University.ORCID 0000-0002-2446-8340
Melanie KillenUniversity of Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-6392-9373

Funding

An Intervention to Promote Positive Peer Relationships and Reduce Prejudice and Bias in ChildhoodR01HD093698 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI KILLEN, MELANIE ANN · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social inequalities limit important opportunities and resources for members of marginalized and disadvantaged groups. Understanding the origins of how children construct their understanding of social inequalities in the context of their everyday peer interactions has the potential to yield novel insights into when-and how-individuals respond to different types of social inequalities. The present study examined whether children (

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentWhite PeopleBlack or African AmericanChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID33074695
PMCPMC7677166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.