Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33074589›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of older people nursing2021

Development of practice guidelines for daily oral care in care-dependent older adults to complement the InterRAI suite of instruments using a modified Delphi approach.

Stefanie Krausch-Hofmann, Ellen Palmers, Dominique Declerck, Joke Duyck

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of older people nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aspiration pneumonia in nursing literature-a mapping review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of the Concurrent Validity of the Oral Health Screening Tool (OHS) in the Mental Health Care Setting: A Pilot Study.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefanie Krausch-HofmannDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4427-5025
Ellen PalmersDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dominique DeclerckDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Population Studies in Oral Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Joke DuyckDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Biomaterials/BIOMAT, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

KU Leuven C24/15/034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo develop practice guidelines for nursing assistants who provide daily oral care to older adults.

backgroundThe interRAI suite of instruments is internationally used in professional health care to assess the needs of care-dependent older persons. An optimised oral health section was developed recently to identify care clients with poor oral health and hygiene. Internationally shared guidelines for daily oral care are needed to complement the optimised oral health section of the interRAI suite of instruments. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe modified Delphi approach started with the preparation of an initial draft. Subsequently, an online survey and a face-to-face discussion were conducted with international experts. Their feedback was used to revise the draft. Two additional online surveys were conducted with the experts to reach consensus agreement for each item of the revised version. The same group of experts was invited to the different study phases.

resultsThe three surveys were completed by 26, 27 and 23 international experts, respectively. A group of 18 experts completed each survey, whereof a subgroup of 11 experts also took part in the face-to-face discussion. Experts were dental hygienists, dentists, nursing scientists, physicians and psychologists from 14 different countries. After the final survey, consensus agreement was reached for 54 of the 57 (94.7%) items, representing the final version of the guidelines.

conclusionAvailable evidence was combined with practical feedback from international experts to develop clear and concise practice guidelines for daily oral care in older adults. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The guidelines will help to improve knowledge and reduce barriers of nursing assistants to provide daily oral care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareOral HealthAgedAged, 80 and overDelphi TechniqueHumansSurveys and Questionnairescare of older peoplenursing careoral healthoral hygiene

Identifiers

PMID33074589
PMCPMC7816227
OpenAlexW3092991203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.