Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33074541›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

In Situ Hybridization Techniques in the Homoscleromorph Sponge Oscarella lobularis.

Laura Fierro-Constaín, Caroline Rocher, Florent Marschal, Quentin Schenkelaars, Nina Séjourné, Carole Borchiellini, Emmanuelle Renard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura Fierro-ConstaínAix Marseille Univ, Avignon Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France.
Caroline RocherAix Marseille Univ, Avignon Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France.
Florent MarschalAix Marseille Univ, Avignon Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France.
Quentin SchenkelaarsDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (IGe3), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nina SéjournéAix Marseille Univ, Avignon Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France.
Carole BorchielliniAix Marseille Univ, Avignon Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France. carole.borchiellini@imbe.fr.
Emmanuelle RenardAix Marseille Univ, Avignon Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France. emmanuelle.renard@imbe.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Porifera are one of the best candidates as the sister group to all other metazoans. Studies on this phylum are therefore expected to shed light on the origin and early evolution of key animal features. Transcriptomic or genomic data acquired during the last 10 years have highlighted the conservation of most of the main genes and pathways involved in the development of the other metazoans. The next step is to determine how similar genetic tool boxes can result in widely dissimilar body plan organization, dynamics, and life histories. To answer these questions, three main axes of research are necessary: (1) conducting more gene expression studies; (2) developing knockdown protocols; and (3) reinterpreting sponge cell biology using modern tools. In this chapter we focus on the in situ hybridization (ISH) technique, needed to establish the spatiotemporal expression of genes, both on whole mount individuals and paraffin sections, and at different stages of development (adults, embryos, larvae, buds) of the homoscleromorph sponge Oscarella lobularis.

Indexed as

AnimalsIn Situ HybridizationMicroscopyPoriferaTissue EmbeddingTissue FixationEvo-devoGene expressionPoriferaRNA probe

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.