Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33074406›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2020

Patient-ventilator asynchrony in acute brain-injured patients: a prospective observational study.

Xu-Ying Luo, Xuan He, Yi-Min Zhou, Yu-Mei Wang, Jing-Ran Chen, Guang-Qiang Chen, Hong-Liang Li, Yan-Lin Yang, Linlin Zhang, Jian-Xin Zhou

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03212482 (Patient-ventilator Asynchrony in Patients With Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03212482 completednot on this map

Patient-ventilator Asynchrony in Patients With Brain Injury

TypeobservationalSponsorJian-Xin ZhouRan2017 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsBrain Injuries, Mechanical Ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Does Lung Protective Ventilation Work in Acute Brain Injury?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Modern Sedation and Analgesia Strategies in Neurocritical Care.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xu-Ying LuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, No. 119, South 4th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China.
Xuan HeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, No. 119, South 4th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China.
Yi-Min ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, No. 119, South 4th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China.
Yu-Mei WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, No. 119, South 4th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China.
Jing-Ran ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, No. 119, South 4th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China.
Guang-Qiang ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, No. 119, South 4th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China.
Hong-Liang LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, No. 119, South 4th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China.
Yan-Lin YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, No. 119, South 4th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China.
Linlin ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, No. 119, South 4th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China.
Jian-Xin ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, No. 119, South 4th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China. zhoujx.cn@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6331-0397

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission No. Z161100000116081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-ventilator asynchrony is common in mechanically ventilated patients and may be related to adverse outcomes. Few studies have reported the occurrence of asynchrony in brain-injured patients. We aimed to investigate the prevalence, type and severity of patient-ventilator asynchrony in mechanically ventilated patients with brain injury.

methodsThis prospective observational study enrolled acute brain-injured patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Esophageal pressure monitoring was established after enrollment. Flow, airway pressure, and esophageal pressure-time waveforms were recorded for a 15-min interval, four times daily for 3 days, for visually detecting asynchrony by offline analysis. At the end of each dataset recording, the respiratory drive was determined by the airway occlusion maneuver. The asynchrony index was calculated to represent the severity. The relationship between the prevalence and the severity of asynchrony with ventilatory modes and settings, respiratory drive, and analgesia and sedation were determined. Association of severe patient-ventilator asynchrony, which was defined as an asynchrony index  ≥ 10%, with clinical outcomes was analyzed.

resultsIn 100 enrolled patients, a total of 1076 15-min waveform datasets covering 330,292 breaths were collected, in which 70,156 (38%) asynchronous breaths were detected. Asynchrony occurred in 96% of patients with the median (interquartile range) asynchrony index of 12.4% (4.3%-26.4%). The most prevalent type was ineffective triggering. No significant difference was found in either prevalence or asynchrony index among different classifications of brain injury (p > 0.05). The prevalence of asynchrony was significantly lower during pressure control/assist ventilation than during other ventilatory modes (p < 0.05). Compared to the datasets without asynchrony, the airway occlusion pressure was significantly lower in datasets with ineffective triggering (p < 0.001). The asynchrony index was significantly higher during the combined use of opioids and sedatives (p < 0.001). Significantly longer duration of ventilation and hospital length of stay after the inclusion were found in patients with severe ineffective triggering (p < 0.05).

conclusionsPatient-ventilator asynchrony is common in brain-injured patients. The most prevalent type is ineffective triggering and its severity is likely related to a long duration of ventilation and hospital stay. Prevalence and severity of asynchrony are associated with ventilatory modes, respiratory drive and analgesia/sedation strategy, suggesting treatment adjustment in this particular population. Trial registration The study has been registered on 4 July 2017 in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03212482) ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03212482 ).

Indexed as

AsynchronyBrain injuryMechanical ventilationMonitoringPrevalenceSeverity

Identifiers

PMID33074406
PMCPMC7570406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.