Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33074396›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

What are the trends in incisional hernia repair? Real-world data over 10 years from the Herniamed registry.

F Köckerling, H Hoffmann, F Mayer, K Zarras, W Reinpold, R Fortelny, D Weyhe, B Lammers, D Adolf, C Schug-Pass

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Incisional hernia repair trends in the last decade (2013-2023): an ACHQC analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What is the association between BMI classes and the outcome in incisional hernia repair?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Umbilical hernia repair by the eTEP, a reproducible and valuable technique.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Robotic Surgical Procedures for Ventral Hernia Repair.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  17. Adhesions After Laparoscopic IPOM-How Serious Is the Problem?Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

F Köckerling *Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany. ferdinand.koeckerling@vivantes.de.
H Hoffmann *Center for Hernia Surgery and Proctology, ZweiChirurgen GmbH, St. Johanns-Vorstadt 44, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
F MayerDepartment of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital of Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
K ZarrasDepartment of Visceral, Minimally Invasive and Oncologic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Düsseldorf, Marien Hospital, Rochusstraße 2, 40479, Düsseldorf, Germany.
W ReinpoldDepartment of Surgery, Wilhelmsburger Hospital Groß Sand, Academic Teaching Hospital of University Hamburg, Groß Sand 3, 21107, Hamburg, Germany.
R FortelnyDepartment of General Surgery, Wilhelminen Hospital, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Medical Faculty, Freudplatz 3, 1020, Vienna, Austria.
D WeyheDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Pius Hospital, University Hospital of Visceral Surgery, Georgstraße 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany.
B LammersDepartment of Surgery I, Section Coloproctology and Hernia Surgery, Lukas Hospital, Preussenstr. 84, 41464, Neuss, Germany.
D AdolfStatConsult GmbH, Halberstädter Strasse 40 a, 39112, Magdeburg, Germany.
C Schug-PassDepartment of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is an increasingly controversial debate about the best possible incisional hernia repair technique. Despite the good outcomes of laparoscopic IPOM, concerns about the intraperitoneal mesh placement and its potential intraabdominal complications have risen. Against that background, this paper now analyzes changes and trends in incisional hernia repair techniques in the recent decade.

methodsBetween 2010 and 2019 a total of 61,627 patients with primary elective incisional hernia repair were enrolled in the Herniamed Registry. The outcome results were assigned to the year of repair and summarized as curves to visualize trends. The explorative Fisher's exact test was used for statistical calculation of significant differences. Since the number of cases entered into the Herniamed Registry for the years 2010-2012 was still relatively small, the years 2013 and 2019 were compared for statistical analysis.

resultsIn the analyzed time period, the proportion of incisional hernias repaired in open suture technique remained unchanged at about 10%. The proportion of laparoscopic IPOM repairs decreased significantly from 33.8% in 2013 to 21.0% (p < 0.001) in 2019. Conversely, the proportion of open sublay repairs increased significantly from 32.1% in 2013 to 41.4% (p < 0.001) in 2019. Starting in 2015, there has also been the introduction and increasing use (4.5% in 2013 vs. 10.0% in 2019; p < 0.001) of new minimally-invasive techniques with placement of a mesh into the sublay/retromuscular/preperitoneal abdominal wall layer (E/MILOS, eTEP, preperitoneal mesh technique).

conclusionAnalysis of data from the Herniamed Registry shows a significant trend to the disadvantage of the laparoscopic IPOM and to the advantage of the open sublay operation and the new minimally-invasive techniques (E/MILOS, eTEP, preperitoneal mesh technique). Despite all the recommendations in the guidelines, 10% of incisional hernias continue to be treated by means of a suture technique.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralIncisional HerniaLaparoscopyHerniorrhaphyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRegistriesSurgical MeshHernia registryIncisional herniaLaparoscopic IPOMSublayTrocar hernia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.