Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33074387›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2021

The association between periconceptional folic acid supplementation and the risk of preterm birth: a population-based retrospective cohort study of 200,000 women in China.

Yu Wu, Yanling Yuan, Cai Kong, Qiuyue Ma, Hanfeng Ye, Wenzhan Jing, Jue Liu, Min Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Single-cell-level digital twins for preterm birth prevention strategies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yanling YuanYunnan Population and Family Planning Research Institute, No.146, Qingnian Road, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650021, Yunnan, China.
Cai KongYunnan Population and Family Planning Research Institute, No.146, Qingnian Road, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650021, Yunnan, China.
Qiuyue MaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Hanfeng YeYunnan Population and Family Planning Research Institute, No.146, Qingnian Road, Wuhua District, Kunming, 650021, Yunnan, China. yehanfengtg@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2128-026X
Wenzhan JingDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jue LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Min LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. liumin@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5059-3743
Peking University · CNYunnan Population and Family Planning Research Institute · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71874003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to examine the association between periconceptional folic acid (FA) supplementation and risk of preterm birth.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in women aged 18-49 who participated in the NFPHEP from 2010 to 2018, and had a singleton livebirth in 129 counties in southwest China. Participants were divided into four groups according to the time period starting FA use: no use, after the last menstrual period, at least 1-2 months before the last menstrual period, at least 3 months before the last menstrual period. The outcomes were preterm birth (gestation < 37 weeks) and early preterm birth (gestation < 34 weeks).

results201,477 women were included and 191,809 (95.2%) had taken FA during periconception. Compared with women who did not take FA, women who started taking FA 1-2 months before their last menstrual period had a 15% lower risk of preterm birth (aOR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92), and women who started taking FA at least 3 months before their last menstrual period had a 20% lower risk of preterm birth (aOR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.75-0.87), but women who started taking FA after their last menstrual period did not appear to reduce the risk of preterm birth.

conclusionsIn this study of 200,000 Chinese women, periconceptional supplementation with FA was associated with a lower risk of preterm birth. Women who started taking FA at least 3 months before their last menstrual period were more likely to reduce the risk of preterm birth.

Indexed as

Premature BirthChinaCohort StudiesDietary SupplementsFemaleFolic AcidHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesFolic AcidChinaFolic acid supplementationPericonceptionPreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID33074387
PMCPMC8137572
OpenAlexW3093463391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.