Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33074174›Full record

ArticleArhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju2020

Capillary bacterial migration on non-nutritive solid surfaces.

Tomislav Ivanković, Uzi Hadad, Ariel Kushmaro, Svjetlana Dekić, Josipa Ćevid, Marko Percela, Jasna Hrenović

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomislav IvankovićUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Uzi HadadBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Ilse Katz Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Ariel KushmaroBen Gurion University of the Negev Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Avram and Stella Goldstein-Goren Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Svjetlana DekićUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Josipa ĆevidUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marko PercelaUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Jasna HrenovićUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Zagreb · HRBen-Gurion University of the Negev · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we describe an additional type of bacterial migration in which bacterial cells migrate vertically across a non-nutritive solid surface carried by capillary forces. Unlike standard motility experiments, these were run on a glass slide inserted into a Falcon tube, partly immersed in a nutrient medium and partly exposed to air. Observations revealed that capillary forces initiated upward cell migration when biofilm was formed at the border between liquid and air. The movement was facilitated by the production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). This motility differs from earlier described swarming, twitching, gliding, sliding, or surfing, although these types of movements are not excluded. We therefore propose to call it "capillary movement of biofilm". This phenomenon may be an ecologically important mode of bacterial motility on solid surfaces.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiofilmsMovementAcinetobacterair/liquid interfaceBacillusbiofilmmicroscopyPseudomonasStaphylococcussurface motility

Identifiers

PMID33074174
PMCPMC7968502
OpenAlexW3093132161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.