Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33074159›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Assessment of Myosteatosis on Computed Tomography by Automatic Generation of a Muscle Quality Map Using a Web-Based Toolkit: Feasibility Study.

Dong Wook Kim, Kyung Won Kim, Yousun Ko, Taeyong Park, Seungwoo Khang, Heeryeol Jeong, Kyoyeong Koo, Jeongjin Lee, Hong-Kyu Kim, Jiyeon Ha and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dong Wook KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7887-657X
Kyung Won KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1532-5970
Yousun KoBiomedical Research Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2181-9555
Taeyong ParkSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-8975
Seungwoo KhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5666-8216
Heeryeol JeongSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1031-1032
Kyoyeong KooSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2950-374X
Jeongjin LeeSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-271X
Hong-Kyu KimHealth Screening and Promotion Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7606-3521
Jiyeon HaDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3496-4134
Yu Sub SungClinical Research Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9215-735X
Youngbin ShinBiomedical Research Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-9586
Asan Medical Center · KRSoongsil University · KRUlsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuscle quality is associated with fatty degeneration or infiltration of the muscle, which may be associated with decreased muscle function and increased disability.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of automated quantitative measurements of the skeletal muscle on computed tomography (CT) images to assess normal-attenuation muscle and myosteatosis.

methodsWe developed a web-based toolkit to generate a muscle quality map by categorizing muscle components. First, automatic segmentation of the total abdominal muscle area (TAMA), visceral fat area, and subcutaneous fat area was performed using a predeveloped deep learning model on a single axial CT image at the L3 vertebral level. Second, the Hounsfield unit of each pixel in the TAMA was measured and categorized into 3 components: normal-attenuation muscle area (NAMA), low-attenuation muscle area (LAMA), and inter/intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) area. The myosteatosis area was derived by adding the LAMA and IMAT area. We tested the feasibility of the toolkit using randomly selected healthy participants, comprising 6 different age groups (20 to 79 years). With stratification by sex, these indices were compared between age groups using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Correlations between the myosteatosis area or muscle densities and fat areas were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient r.

resultsA total of 240 healthy participants (135 men and 105 women) with 40 participants per age group were included in the study. In the 1-way ANOVA, the NAMA, LAMA, and IMAT were significantly different between the age groups in both male and female participants (P≤.004), whereas the TAMA showed a significant difference only in male participants (male, P<.001; female, P=.88). The myosteatosis area had a strong negative correlation with muscle densities (r=-0.833 to -0.894), a moderate positive correlation with visceral fat areas (r=0.607 to 0.669), and a weak positive correlation with the subcutaneous fat areas (r=0.305 to 0.441).

conclusionsThe automated web-based toolkit is feasible and enables quantitative CT assessment of myosteatosis, which can be a potential quantitative biomarker for evaluating structural and functional changes brought on by aging in the skeletal muscle.

Indexed as

automatedbody compositioncomputed tomographyCTfeasibilitymusclesarcopeniascanskeletalweb-based toolx-ray

Identifiers

PMID33074159
PMCPMC7605976
OpenAlexW3092830281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.