Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33074045›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics

Genome-wide study of the effect of blood collection tubes on the cell-free DNA methylome.

Ruben Van Paemel, Andries De Koker, Christa Caggiano, Annelien Morlion, Pieter Mestdagh, Bram De Wilde, Jo Vandesompele, Katleen De Preter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Metabolic Diseases.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruben Van PaemelCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7324-3570
Andries De KokerCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3939-7650
Christa CaggianoDepartments of Neurology and Computational Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5755-1274
Annelien MorlionCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1791-2359
Pieter MestdaghCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7821-9684
Bram De WildeCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0213-1322
Jo VandesompeleCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6274-0184
Katleen De PreterCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7726-5096
Ghent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The methylation pattern of cfDNA, isolated from liquid biopsies, is gaining substantial interest for diagnosis and monitoring of diseases. We have evaluated the impact of type of blood collection tube and time delay between blood draw and plasma preparation on bisulphite-based cfDNA methylation profiling. Fifteen tubes of blood were drawn from three healthy volunteer subjects (BD Vacutainer K2E EDTA spray tubes, Streck Cell-Free DNA BCT tubes, PAXgene Blood ccfDNA tubes, Roche Cell-Free DNA Collection tubes and Biomatrica LBgard blood tubes in triplicate). Samples were either immediately processed or stored at room temperature for 24 or 72 hours before plasma preparation. DNA fragment size was evaluated by capillary electrophoresis. Reduced representation bisulphite sequencing was performed on the cell-free DNA isolated from these plasma samples. We evaluated the impact of blood tube and time delay on several quality control metrics. All preservation tubes performed similar on the quality metrics that were evaluated. Furthermore, a considerable increase in cfDNA concentration and the fraction of it derived from NK cells was observed after a 72-hour time delay in EDTA tubes. The methylation pattern of cfDNA is robust and reproducible in between the different preservation tubes. EDTA tubes processed as soon as possible, preferably within 24 hours, are the most cost effective. If immediate processing is not possible, preservation tubes are valid alternatives.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsGenome-Wide Association StudyBlood Specimen CollectionDNA MethylationEpigenomeHumansLiquid BiopsyCell-Free Nucleic Acidscell-free reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (cfRRBS)cfDNALiquid biopsymethylationpre-analytical factors

Identifiers

PMID33074045
PMCPMC8216177
OpenAlexW3092757363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.