ReviewCancer science2021
Multiple mutations within individual oncogenes.
Review in Cancer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oncogenic PI3Kα variants reveal graded conformational spectrum with mutation-specific cryptic pockets.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- Oncogenic PI3Kα variants reveal graded conformational spectrum with mutation-specific cryptic pockets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Protein stability models fail to capture epistatic interactions of double point mutations.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Oncogenic composite mutations can be predicted by co-mutations and their chromosomal location.Molecular oncology · 2024Article
- Protein stability models fail to capture epistatic interactions of double point mutations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Co-occurring Mutations in Different Genes Can Fuel Oncogenic Signaling and Serve as Metastatic Tumor Markers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Case Report: ConcurrentFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Cancer and Autism: How PTEN Mutations Degrade Function at the Membrane and Isoform Expression in the Human Brain.Journal of molecular biology · 2023Article
- Integrative multi-omic cancer profiling reveals DNA methylation patterns associated with therapeutic vulnerability and cell-of-origin.Cancer cell · 2023Article
- Spatial genomic diversity associated with APOBEC mutagenesis in squamous cell carcinoma arising from ovarian teratoma.Cancer science · 2023Article
- Pan-cancer clinical impact of latent drivers from double mutations.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Solute Carrier Family 7 Member 11 (SLC7A11) is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- miR-30d-5p: A Non-Coding RNA With Potential Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Applications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Multiple mutations within individual oncogenes.Cancer science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies of the cancer genome have identified numerous patients harboring multiple mutations (MM) within individual oncogenes. These MM (de novo MM) in cis synergistically activate the mutated oncogene and promote tumorigenesis, indicating a positive epistatic interaction between mutations. The relatively frequent de novo MM suggest that intramolecular positive epistasis is widespread in oncogenes. Studies also suggest that negative and higher-order epistasis affects de novo MM. Comparison of de novo MM and MM associated with drug-resistant secondary mutations (secondary MM) revealed several similarities with respect to allelic configuration, mutational selection and functionality of individual mutations. Conversely, they have several differences, most notably the difference in drug sensitivities. Secondary MM usually confer resistance to molecularly targeted therapies, whereas several de novo MM are associated with increased sensitivity, implying that both can be useful as therapeutic biomarkers. Unlike secondary MM in which specific secondary resistant mutations are selected, minor (infrequent) functionally weak mutations are convergently selected in de novo MM, which may provide an explanation as to why such mutations accumulate in cancer. The third type of MM is MM from different subclones. This type of MM is associated with parallel evolution, which may contribute to relapse and treatment failure. Collectively, MM within individual oncogenes are diverse, but all types of MM are associated with cancer evolution and therapeutic response. Further evaluation of oncogenic MM is warranted to gain a deeper understanding of cancer genetics and evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.