Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33073435›Full record

ReviewCancer science2021

Multiple mutations within individual oncogenes.

Yuki Saito, Junji Koya, Keisuke Kataoka

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Protein stability models fail to capture epistatic interactions of double point mutations.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Case Report: ConcurrentFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuki SaitoDivision of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2686-9604
Junji KoyaDivision of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0605-1226
Keisuke KataokaDivision of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8263-9902
Keio University · JP

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Research (Exploratory) 17K19592National Cancer Center Research and Development Funds 30-A-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies of the cancer genome have identified numerous patients harboring multiple mutations (MM) within individual oncogenes. These MM (de novo MM) in cis synergistically activate the mutated oncogene and promote tumorigenesis, indicating a positive epistatic interaction between mutations. The relatively frequent de novo MM suggest that intramolecular positive epistasis is widespread in oncogenes. Studies also suggest that negative and higher-order epistasis affects de novo MM. Comparison of de novo MM and MM associated with drug-resistant secondary mutations (secondary MM) revealed several similarities with respect to allelic configuration, mutational selection and functionality of individual mutations. Conversely, they have several differences, most notably the difference in drug sensitivities. Secondary MM usually confer resistance to molecularly targeted therapies, whereas several de novo MM are associated with increased sensitivity, implying that both can be useful as therapeutic biomarkers. Unlike secondary MM in which specific secondary resistant mutations are selected, minor (infrequent) functionally weak mutations are convergently selected in de novo MM, which may provide an explanation as to why such mutations accumulate in cancer. The third type of MM is MM from different subclones. This type of MM is associated with parallel evolution, which may contribute to relapse and treatment failure. Collectively, MM within individual oncogenes are diverse, but all types of MM are associated with cancer evolution and therapeutic response. Further evaluation of oncogenic MM is warranted to gain a deeper understanding of cancer genetics and evolution.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisHumansMutationNeoplasmsOncogenesdrug sensitivityepistasismultiple mutationsprecision medicinesynergy

Identifiers

PMID33073435
PMCPMC7894016
OpenAlexW3093335987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.