Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33073419›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2021

High Throughput Risk and Impact Screening of Chemicals in Consumer Products.

Olivier Jolliet, Lei Huang, Ping Hou, Peter Fantke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. USEtox modeling of children's exposures to Bisphenol A (BPA) and alternatives in toys.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Methods for Building Community-engaged Partnerships in Ecotoxicology.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exposure forecasting - ExpoCast - for data-poor chemicals in commerce and the environment.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Mixture Risk Assessment of Complex Real-Life Mixtures-The PANORAMIX Project.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Olivier JollietEnvironmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6955-4210
Lei HuangEnvironmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7846-9760
Ping HouSchool for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1001-3107
Peter FantkeQuantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7148-6982
University of Michigan · USTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquitous presence of more than 80,000 chemicals in thousands of consumer products used on a daily basis stresses the need for screening a broader set of chemicals than the traditional well-studied suspect chemicals. This high-throughput screening combines stochastic chemical-product usage with mass balance-based exposure models and toxicity data to prioritize risks associated with household products. We first characterize product usage using the stochastic SHEDS-HT model and chemical content in common household products from the CPDat database, the chemical amounts applied daily varying over more than six orders of magnitude, from mg to kg. We then estimate multi-pathways near- and far-field exposures for 5,500 chemical-product combinations, applying an extended USEtox model to calculate product intake fractions ranging from 0.001 to ∼1, and exposure doses varying over more than nine orders of magnitude. Combining exposure doses with chemical-specific dose-responses and reference doses shows that risks can be substantial for multiple home maintenance products, such as paints or paint strippers, for some home-applied pesticides, leave-on personal care products, and cleaning products. Sixty percent of the chemical-product combinations have hazard quotients exceeding 1, and 9% of the combinations have lifetime cancer risks exceeding 10

Indexed as

CarcinogensCosmeticsEnvironmental ExposureHumansModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsPesticidesRefuse DisposalRisk AssessmentStochastic ProcessesVolatile Organic CompoundsWaste Disposal, FluidWater PurificationCarcinogensCosmeticsPesticidesVolatile Organic CompoundsChemical ingredientshigh throughput exposure and risk screeninghousehold products

Identifiers

PMID33073419
PMCPMC8246852
OpenAlexW3093421354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.