Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33073396›Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2021

Liver Metastases of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Implications for an Updated Staging System.

Angela Lamarca, Alvaro Santos-Laso, Kirsten Utpatel, Adelaida La Casta, Simone Stock, Alejandro Forner, Jorge Adeva, Trine Folseraas, Luca Fabris, Rocio I R Macias and 9 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cholangiocarcinoma 2026: status quo, unmet needs and priorities.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ivosidenib for IDH1-Mutant Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Insights From a Multicenter Real-World Study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Resection of multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.The British journal of surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Angela LamarcaMedical Oncology/Institute of Cancer Sciences, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9696-6122
Alvaro Santos-LasoDepartment of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastian, Spain.
Kirsten UtpatelInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Adelaida La CastaDepartment of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastian, Spain.
Simone StockInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Alejandro FornerBCLC group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9014-4950
Jorge AdevaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3959-4120
Trine Folseraas7Section of Gastroenterology and the Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Luca FabrisDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Rocio I R MaciasNational Institute for the Study of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases (CIBERehd), The National Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4748-0326
Marcin KrawczykDepartment of Medicine II, Saarland University Medical Centre, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Marek KrawczykDepartment of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Vincenzo CardinaleGastroenterology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Chiara BraconiMedical Oncology, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Domenico AlvaroGastroenterology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Matthias EvertInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Jesus M BanalesDepartment of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastian, Spain.
Juan W ValleMedical Oncology/Institute of Cancer Sciences, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Group: on behalf of the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) with liver metastases is perceived to have a poor prognosis, but the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classifies them as early stage in the absence of lymph nodes or extrahepatic spread. APPROACH AND

resultsPatients with iCCA from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries with survival/staging (AJCC v.7) data were eligible. Modified staging was used (mAJCC v.7): group A: stages I-III (excluding T2bN0); group B: stage IVa (excluding T2bN1M0); group C: liver metastases (T2bN0/1); and group D: stage IVb (extrahepatic metastases). Survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression) was performed in an ENS-CCA training cohort (TC) and findings internally (ENS-CCA iVC) and externally (SEER) validated. The aim was to assess whether liver metastases (group C) had a shorter survival compared to other early stages (group A) to propose a modified version of AJCC v.8 (mAJCC v.8). A total of 574 and 4,171 patients from the ENS-CCA and SEER registries were included. Following the new classification, 19.86% and 17.31% of patients from the ENS-CCA and SEER registries were reclassified into group C, respectively. In the ENS-CCA TC, multivariable Cox regression was adjusted for obesity (p = 0.026) and performance status (P < 0.001); patients in group C (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.18-5.42; P = 0.017) had a higher risk of death (vs. group A). Findings were validated in the ENS-CCA iVC (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 2.04-4.19; P < 0.001) and in the SEER registry (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.68-2.09; P < 0.001).

conclusionsiCCA with liver metastases has a worse outcome than other early stages of iCCA. Given that AJCC v.8 does not take this into consideration, a modification of AJCC v.8 (mAJCC v.8), including "liver metastases: multiple liver lesions, with or without vascular invasion" as an "M1a stage," is suggested.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSEER ProgramSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID33073396
PMCPMC8252018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.