Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33073179›Full record

ArticleStats2020

A Bayesian Adaptive Design in Cancer Phase I Trials Using Dose Combinations with Ordinal Toxicity Grades.

Márcio A Diniz, Sungjin Kim, Mourad Tighiouart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stats, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. N-of-1 medicine.Singapore medical journal · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Márcio A DinizBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Samuel Oschin Compreenhensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 700 N. San Vicente Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90069, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2427-7843
Sungjin KimBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Samuel Oschin Compreenhensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 700 N. San Vicente Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90069, USA.
Mourad TighiouartBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Samuel Oschin Compreenhensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 700 N. San Vicente Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90069, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8021-5690

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis: Biology and TargetingP01CA098912 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHUNG, LELAND W.K. · 2003 to 2019
$24.0M
The paradoxical roles of beta hydroxy butyrate in the liver pro-metastatic nicheP01CA233452 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI BHOWMICK, NEIL A., LU, SHELLY CHI-LOO · 2020 to 2024
$9.5M
Advancing Analysis and Interpretation ofAdverse Events and PROs in Cancer Clinical TrialsU01CA232859 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI GANZ, PATRICIA A., TIGHIOUART, MOURAD · 2018 to 2023
$3.7M
Design of Cancer Phase I/II Clinical Trials Using Drug Combinations of Cytotoxic and Biologic AgentsR01CA188480 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI TIGHIOUART, MOURAD · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NCI NIH HHS P01 CA098912NCI NIH HHS P01 CA233452NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188480NCI NIH HHS U01 CA232859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a Bayesian adaptive design for early phase drug combination cancer trials incorporating ordinal grade of toxicities. Parametric models are used to describe the relationship between the dose combinations and the probabilities of the ordinal toxicities under the proportional odds assumption. Trial design proceeds by treating cohorts of two patients simultaneously receiving different dose combinations. Specifically, at each stage of the trial, we seek the dose of one agent by minimizing the Bayes risk with respect to a loss function given the current dose of the other agent. We consider two types of loss functions corresponding to the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) and Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC). At the end of the trial, we estimate the MTD curve as a function of Bayes estimates of the model parameters. We evaluate design operating characteristics in terms of safety of the trial and percent of dose recommendation at dose combination neighborhoods around the true MTD by comparing this design to the one that uses a binary indicator of DLT. The methodology is further adapted to the case of a pre-specified discrete set of dose combinations.

Indexed as

Continual Reassessment Methoddrug combinationEscalation With Overdose Controlordinal toxicityphase I designs

Identifiers

PMID33073179
PMCPMC7561046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.