Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33073028›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2020

The Combined Impact of CLIR Post-Analytical Tools and Second Tier Testing on the Performance of Newborn Screening for Disorders of Propionate, Methionine, and Cobalamin Metabolism.

Dimitar K Gavrilov, Amy L Piazza, Gisele Pino, Coleman Turgeon, Dietrich Matern, Devin Oglesbee, Kimiyo Raymond, Silvia Tortorelli, Piero Rinaldo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Use of Molecular Genetic Analyses in Danish Routine Newborn Screening.International journal of neonatal screening · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimitar K GavrilovBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Piazza.Amy@mayo.edu (A.L.P.); Pino.gisele@mayo.edu (G.P.); Turgeon.Coleman@mayo.edu (C.T.); Matern@mayo.edu (D.M.); Oglesbee.Devin@mayo.edu (D.O.); Raymond.Kimiyo@mayo.edu (K.R.); Tortorelli.Silvia@mayo.edu (S.T.); Rinaldo@mayo.edu (P.R.).
Amy L PiazzaBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Piazza.Amy@mayo.edu (A.L.P.); Pino.gisele@mayo.edu (G.P.); Turgeon.Coleman@mayo.edu (C.T.); Matern@mayo.edu (D.M.); Oglesbee.Devin@mayo.edu (D.O.); Raymond.Kimiyo@mayo.edu (K.R.); Tortorelli.Silvia@mayo.edu (S.T.); Rinaldo@mayo.edu (P.R.).
Gisele PinoBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Piazza.Amy@mayo.edu (A.L.P.); Pino.gisele@mayo.edu (G.P.); Turgeon.Coleman@mayo.edu (C.T.); Matern@mayo.edu (D.M.); Oglesbee.Devin@mayo.edu (D.O.); Raymond.Kimiyo@mayo.edu (K.R.); Tortorelli.Silvia@mayo.edu (S.T.); Rinaldo@mayo.edu (P.R.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8529-6135
Coleman TurgeonBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Piazza.Amy@mayo.edu (A.L.P.); Pino.gisele@mayo.edu (G.P.); Turgeon.Coleman@mayo.edu (C.T.); Matern@mayo.edu (D.M.); Oglesbee.Devin@mayo.edu (D.O.); Raymond.Kimiyo@mayo.edu (K.R.); Tortorelli.Silvia@mayo.edu (S.T.); Rinaldo@mayo.edu (P.R.).
Dietrich MaternBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Piazza.Amy@mayo.edu (A.L.P.); Pino.gisele@mayo.edu (G.P.); Turgeon.Coleman@mayo.edu (C.T.); Matern@mayo.edu (D.M.); Oglesbee.Devin@mayo.edu (D.O.); Raymond.Kimiyo@mayo.edu (K.R.); Tortorelli.Silvia@mayo.edu (S.T.); Rinaldo@mayo.edu (P.R.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6298-4138
Devin OglesbeeBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Piazza.Amy@mayo.edu (A.L.P.); Pino.gisele@mayo.edu (G.P.); Turgeon.Coleman@mayo.edu (C.T.); Matern@mayo.edu (D.M.); Oglesbee.Devin@mayo.edu (D.O.); Raymond.Kimiyo@mayo.edu (K.R.); Tortorelli.Silvia@mayo.edu (S.T.); Rinaldo@mayo.edu (P.R.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7147-5527
Kimiyo RaymondBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Piazza.Amy@mayo.edu (A.L.P.); Pino.gisele@mayo.edu (G.P.); Turgeon.Coleman@mayo.edu (C.T.); Matern@mayo.edu (D.M.); Oglesbee.Devin@mayo.edu (D.O.); Raymond.Kimiyo@mayo.edu (K.R.); Tortorelli.Silvia@mayo.edu (S.T.); Rinaldo@mayo.edu (P.R.).
Silvia TortorelliBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Piazza.Amy@mayo.edu (A.L.P.); Pino.gisele@mayo.edu (G.P.); Turgeon.Coleman@mayo.edu (C.T.); Matern@mayo.edu (D.M.); Oglesbee.Devin@mayo.edu (D.O.); Raymond.Kimiyo@mayo.edu (K.R.); Tortorelli.Silvia@mayo.edu (S.T.); Rinaldo@mayo.edu (P.R.).
Piero RinaldoBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Piazza.Amy@mayo.edu (A.L.P.); Pino.gisele@mayo.edu (G.P.); Turgeon.Coleman@mayo.edu (C.T.); Matern@mayo.edu (D.M.); Oglesbee.Devin@mayo.edu (D.O.); Raymond.Kimiyo@mayo.edu (K.R.); Tortorelli.Silvia@mayo.edu (S.T.); Rinaldo@mayo.edu (P.R.).
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expansion of the recommend uniform screening panel to include more than 50 primary and secondary target conditions has resulted in a substantial increase of false positive results. As an alternative to subjective manipulation of cutoff values and overutilization of molecular testing, here we describe the performance outcome of an algorithm for disorders of methionine, cobalamin, and propionate metabolism that includes: (1) first tier screening inclusive of the broadest available spectrum of markers measured by tandem mass spectrometry; (2) integration of all results into a score of likelihood of disease for each target condition calculated by post-analytical interpretive tools created byCollaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR), a multivariate pattern recognition software; and (3) further evaluation of abnormal scores by a second tier test measuring homocysteine, methylmalonic acid, and methylcitric acid. This approach can consistently reduce false positive rates to a <0.01% level, which is the threshold of precision newborn screening. We postulate that broader adoption of this algorithm could lead to substantial savings in health care expenditures. More importantly, it could prevent the stress and anxiety experienced by many families when faced with an abnormal newborn screening result that is later resolved as a false positive outcome.

Indexed as

Collaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR)false positive ratenewborn screening (NBS)second tier test (2TT)

Identifiers

PMID33073028
PMCPMC7423003
OpenAlexW3015582064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.