Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072970›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2019

A Multicentre Pilot Study of a Two-Tier Newborn Sickle Cell Disease Screening Procedure with a First Tier Based on a Fully Automated MALDI-TOF MS Platform.

Pierre Naubourg, Marven El Osta, David Rageot, Olivier Grunewald, Gilles Renom, Patrick Ducoroy, Jean-Marc Périni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advances and Gaps in Global Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pierre NaubourgBiomaneo, 22B boulevard Winston Churchill, F-21000 Dijon, France.
Marven El OstaBiomaneo, 22B boulevard Winston Churchill, F-21000 Dijon, France.
David RageotCLIPP, Clinical Innovation Proteomic Platform, Université de Bourgogne Franche Comté, F-21000 Dijon, France.
Olivier GrunewaldNewborn Screening Laboratory, Biology and Pathology Center, Lille University Medical Centre, F-59000 Lille, France.
Gilles RenomNewborn Screening Laboratory, Biology and Pathology Center, Lille University Medical Centre, F-59000 Lille, France.
Patrick DucoroyBiomaneo, 22B boulevard Winston Churchill, F-21000 Dijon, France.
Jean-Marc PériniNewborn Screening Laboratory, Biology and Pathology Center, Lille University Medical Centre, F-59000 Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4233-6288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reference methods used for sickle cell disease (SCD) screening usually include two analytical steps: a first tier for differentiating haemoglobin S (HbS) heterozygotes, HbS homozygotes and β-thalassemia from other samples, and a confirmatory second tier. Here, we evaluated a first-tier approach based on a fully automated matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) platform with automated sample processing, a laboratory information management system and NeoSickle

Indexed as

MALDI-TOFmass spectrometrynewborn screeningpreventionsickle cell diseasethalassemia

Identifiers

PMID33072970
PMCPMC7510195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.