Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072958›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2018

Consumer Satisfaction with Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening in a Midwifery-Led Maternity Setting.

Elza Cloete, Thomas L Gentles, Robert A Lutter, Kelly Richards, Kim Ward, Frank H Bloomfield

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elza CloeteLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2190-0959
Thomas L GentlesPaediatric and Congenital Cardiac Services, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Robert A LutterHeart Kids New Zealand, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Kelly RichardsHawke's Bay District Health Board, Hastings 4120, New Zealand.
Kim WardLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4436-8267
Frank H BloomfieldLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-6577
University of Auckland · NZHawke's Bay Hospital · NZNational Heart Foundation of New Zealand · NZStarship Children's Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulse oximetry screening to detect hypoxaemia in newborn infants was introduced at birthing facilities in New Zealand during a feasibility study determining barriers and enablers to universal screening in a midwifery-led maternity system focused on community values and partnership with, and participation by, consumers. During the 2-year study period, parents of infants who underwent pulse oximetry screening were invited to complete a written survey to investigate consumer satisfaction. Respondents ranked their satisfaction with the test and with information resources on a five-level Likert scale. Additional comments were added in a free text space. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. A total of 657 surveys were included for analysis. Consumers were satisfied with the screening procedure; 94% either agreed or strongly agreed that it is an important health check. Although the quality of information sources was deemed good, a third of participants indicated a wish to obtain more information. Some participants stated that retention of information was an issue, reporting that they were fatigued following the birth. Consumers are receptive to pulse oximetry screening. Sharing information (while considering the receptivity of parents) and engaging the parents of newborn infants are factors that are paramount to the success of newborn screening initiatives.

Indexed as

consumer participationinformed consentnewbornpulse oximetryscreening

Identifiers

PMID33072958
PMCPMC7548887
OpenAlexW2902300219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.