Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072934›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2018

Raising Awareness of False Positive Newborn Screening Results Arising from Pivalate-Containing Creams and Antibiotics in Europe When Screening for Isovaleric Acidaemia.

James R Bonham, Rachel S Carling, Martin Lindner, Leifur Franzson, Rolf Zetterstrom, Francois Boemer, Roberto Cerone, Francois Eyskens, Laura Vilarinho, David M Hougaard and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

James R BonhamSheffield Children's NHS FT, Sheffield, S10 2TH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8161-9021
Rachel S CarlingSouth East Thames Regional Newborn Screening Laboratory, Biochemical Sciences, Viapath, Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS FT, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Martin LindnerDivision for Neuropediatrics and prevention, Department of General Pediatrics, University of Frankfurt/Main, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Leifur FranzsonDepartment of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Iceland, Landspitali, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.
Rolf ZetterstromCentre for Inherited Metabolic Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
Francois BoemerBiochemical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Human Genetics, CHU Sart-Tilman, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-9524
Roberto CeroneDepartment of Pediatrics, Giannina Gaslini Institute, Largo Gaslini 5, 16147 Genoa, Italy.
Francois EyskensPCMA vzw Centre for Inherited Metabolic Disorders in Children, Antwerp University Hospital UZA, 2650 Antwerpen-Edegem, Belgium.
Laura VilarinhoNewborn Screening, Metabolism & Genetics Unit, Human Genetics Department, National Institute of Health Dr Ricardo Jorge, 4049-019 Porto, Portugal.
David M HougaardDanish Center for Neonatal Screening, Director Department for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen Denmark.
Peter C J I SchielenReference Laboratory for Neonatal Screening, Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5630-7322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the early and asymptomatic recognition of treatable conditions offered by newborn screening confers clear health benefits for the affected child, the clinical referral of patients with screen positive results can cause significant harm for some families. The use of pivalate-containing antibiotics and more recently the inclusion of neopentanoate as a component within moisturising creams used as nipple balms by nursing mothers can result in a significant number of false positive results when screening for isovaleric acidaemia (IVA) by measuring C5 acylcarnitine. A recent survey conducted within centres from nine countries indicated that this form of contamination had been or was a significant confounding factor in the detection of IVA in seven of the nine who responded. In three of these seven the prominent cause was believed to derive from the use of moisturising creams and in another three from antibiotics containing pivalate; one country reported that the cause was mixed. As a result, four of these seven centres routinely perform second tier testing to resolve C5 isobars when an initial C5 result is elevated, and a fifth is considering making this change within their national programme. The use of creams containing neopentanoate by nursing mothers and evolving patterns in the prescription of pivalate-containing antibiotics during pregnancy require those involved in the design and operation of newborn screening programmes used to detect IVA and the doctors who receive clinical referrals from these programmes to maintain an awareness of the potential impact of this form of interference on patient results.

Indexed as

antibioticC5 acylcarnitineisovaleric acidaemiaIVA interference tandem mass spectrometrymoisturing creampivalatepivoloyl

Identifiers

PMID33072934
PMCPMC7510208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.