Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072926›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Prevalence and risk factors of COVID-19 suicidal behavior in Bangladeshi population: are healthcare professionals at greater risk?

Mohammed A Mamun, Tahmina Akter, Fatematuz Zohra, Najmuj Sakib, A K M Israfil Bhuiyan, Palash Chandra Banik, Mohammad Muhit

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysing the impact of COVID-19 on the mothers of Bangladesh: hearing the unheard.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed A MamunCentre for Health Innovation, Networking, Training, Action and Research - Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tahmina AkterCentre for Health Innovation, Networking, Training, Action and Research - Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Fatematuz ZohraCentre for Health Innovation, Networking, Training, Action and Research - Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Najmuj SakibCentre for Health Innovation, Networking, Training, Action and Research - Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
A K M Israfil BhuiyanCentre for Health Innovation, Networking, Training, Action and Research - Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Palash Chandra BanikDepartment of Noncommunicable Diseases, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad MuhitCSF Global, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Bangladesh University of Health Sciences · BDChattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · BDJahangirnagar University · BDUniversity of South Asia · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent COVID-19 researches suggest that both general population and health-care providers (HCPs) are at risk of elevated psychological sufferings including suicidality. However, suicidality has not been addressed properly, although mental health problems are studied globally. Besides, the extreme fear of COVID-19 infection is being existed among the Bangladeshi HCPs, that is reported by a recent patients' suicide because of HCPs treatment negligence.

methodsA web-based cross-sectional study was administered through the social media platforms. A total 3,388 respondents took part in the survey (mean age 30.1 ± 6.4 years) among them 834 were frontline HCPs (30.7 ± 5.6 years). The measures included socio-demographics, PPE-related and patient-care related information and a question concerned with the COVID-19 suicidal behavior.

resultsAbout 6.1% of the total participants had suicidal behavior, with no detectable differences within the groups (i.e., general population and HCPs). Regression analysis showed that being female, being divorced, and having no child were emerged as independent predictors for suicidality. There was no significant association between the PPE-related or patient-care related variables and suicidal behavior of the HCPs. Majority of the participants sometimes had fear of death although no significant relation of the factor was found with suicidality. LIMITATIONS: The study can be limited because of its nature (i.e., cross-sectional self-reporting online survey) and not considering non-COVID-19 related suicide risk factors etc.

conclusionsThe present findings identified the substantial proportion of the HCPs and general population had COVID 19 related suicidal behavior. It can be used to advocate a large-scale suicide safety plan using a multidisciplinary approach herein.

Indexed as

COVID-19 and suicideFrontline worker's suicideHealth-care professional' suicidePsychologyPublic healthSuicidal behaviorSuicidal ideationSuicide in Bangladesh

Identifiers

PMID33072926
PMCPMC7554485
OpenAlexW3093198968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.