ArticleAdvanced materials technologies2020
Extrusion and Microfluidic-based Bioprinting to Fabricate Biomimetic Tissues and Organs.
Article in Advanced materials technologies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for systemic diseases and localized injuries.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Manufacturing, Cell Regulation, and Coculture Strategies for Vascularization and Neural Innervation of Skeletal Muscle Tissue.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Elastic scaffolds reinforced stem cell-laden collagen-derived hybrid hydrogels to engineer 3D anisotropic cellular microenvironment.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Digital light processing bioprinting: bioink innovations and applications in tissue and organ regeneration.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- 3D bioprinting of microfluidic systems for cardiac regenerative medicine: from biofabrication to organ-on-a-chip.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Highly bio-adapted hydrogels for tendon-bone interface regeneration: Natural healing inspiration, design strategies, and biomedical potential.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Unconventional bioprinting modalities for advanced tissue biofabrication.Biomaterials · 2026Review
- 3D-bioprinting for joint regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Progressive Insights into 3D Bioprinting for Corneal Tissue Restoration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- 3D Bioprinting Strategies in Autoimmune Disease Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Integrating Bioprinting and Increased Throughput: Next-Generation Models for Cardiac Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Materials for Yeast Immobilization in Alcoholic Fermentation: Bridging Conventional Techniques and 3D Bioprinting.Polymers · 2025Review
- The Synergy of Artificial Intelligence and 3D Bioprinting: Unlocking New Frontiers in Precision and Tissue Fabrication.Advanced functional materials · 2025Article
- Organ-Specific Strategies in Bioprinting: Addressing Translational Challenges in the Heart, Liver, Kidney, and Pancreas.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Integrating Additive and Traditional Manufacturing for Multiscale Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- From Medical Imaging to Bioprinted Tissues: The Importance of Workflow Optimisation for Improved Cell Function.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Microfluidic technologies for wearable and implantable biomedical devices.Lab on a chip · 2025Review
- 3D Printing of Conducting Polymer Hydrogels for Electrostimulation-Assisted Tissue Engineering.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Bioprinting Vascularized Constructs for Clinical Relevance: Engineering Hydrogel Systems for Biological Maturity.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Three-Dimensional In Vitro Models for Studies of Liver Fibrosis.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next generation engineered tissue constructs with complex and ordered architectures aim to better mimic the native tissue structures, largely due to advances in three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting techniques. Extrusion bioprinting has drawn tremendous attention due to its widespread availability, cost-effectiveness, simplicity, and its facile and rapid processing. However, poor printing resolution and low speed have limited its fidelity and clinical implementation. To circumvent the downsides associated with extrusion printing, microfluidic technologies are increasingly being implemented in 3D bioprinting for engineering living constructs. These technologies enable biofabrication of heterogeneous biomimetic structures made of different types of cells, biomaterials, and biomolecules. Microfluiding bioprinting technology enables highly controlled fabrication of 3D constructs in high resolutions and it has been shown to be useful for building tubular structures and vascularized constructs, which may promote the survival and integration of implanted engineered tissues. Although this field is currently in its early development and the number of bioprinted implants is limited, it is envisioned that it will have a major impact on the production of customized clinical-grade tissue constructs. Further studies are, however, needed to fully demonstrate the effectiveness of the technology in the lab and its translation to the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.