ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2020
Coronary Revascularization of Giant Aneurysms in Children With Kawasaki Disease: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Giant coronary aneurysms in children with Kawasaki disease and major cardiac complications and dynamic follow-up.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Article
- Case Report: Surgical management of giant multiple aneurysms after Kawasaki disease in a teenager.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, >100 cases of coronary artery stenotic lesions due to Kawasaki disease were treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Surgical indications include stenosis of >75%, myocardial infarction history, electrocardiographic changes, and ischemia, as detected by myocardial scintigraphy and electrocardiography, due to drugs or exercise. Some centers have reported good patency rates, even in infants. The advantages of CABG in younger patients are minimal loss of left ventricular function, early elimination of post-operative ischemia risk, and improved quality of life. However, the disadvantage of performing CABG in younger patients is the small coronary artery diameter and the thin vessel wall, which can lead to post-operative occlusion, especially when performed by inexperienced surgeons. The optimal timing of CABG varies by institution and case, which depends on the presence or absence of complications, such as left ventricular dysfunction or valve regurgitation, and surgeon's experience. Importantly, unlike adult surgery, childhood CABG needs to be kept open for the very longest possible period of time to determine the optimal conditions for surgery. We report two pediatric cases of giant coronary artery aneurysms diagnosed in infancy. During school age, the patients had a mild decline of left ventricular ejection function. In one case, there were no clinical symptoms because of the development of collateral vessels and limitation of exercise. Both patients underwent surgery with good results. The gastric gastroepiploic artery could be anastomosed owing to the development of collateral blood vessels, although it was obstructed. At 1 year after surgery, both patients had a good post-operative course without complications of anastomotic stenosis or myocardial damage due to aneurysm resection. If conditions are favorable, bypass surgery can be postponed to several years until the coronary arteries are sufficiently large to warrant a delay in coronary artery stenosis in cases of infantile Kawasaki disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.