ReviewFrontiers in oncology2020
Diagnostic Imaging Methods and Comparative Analysis of Orbital Cavernous Hemangioma.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- An extraconal orbital cavernous venous malformation: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Value of high-frequency color Doppler ultrasound for preorbital mass diagnosis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparative outcomes of cryoextraction and conventional extraction in anterior and lateral orbitotomy for orbital cavernous venous malformations (so-called cavernous hemangioma).BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Article
- Orbital masses: a review of CT imaging characteristics.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Comparison of lacrimal gland dimensions and volume in unilateral Ahmed glaucoma valve versus trabeculectomy.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- MR Imaging Characteristics of Solitary Fibrous Tumors of the Orbit : Case Series of 18 Patients.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Biological identity of orbital cavernous venous malformations.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2024Review
- Bleeding cavernous hemangioma of lower lip: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- A signature of structural MRI features at 3 Tesla allows an accurate characterization of orbital cavernous venous malformation.European radiology · 2023Article
- End-to-End Deep-Learning-Based Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Orbital Tumors on Computed Tomography Images.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Vascular lesions of the pediatric orbit: A radiological walkthrough.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Case Report: High-Definition 4K-3D Exoscope for Removal of an Orbital Cavernous Hemangioma Using a Transpalpebral Approach.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- MRI-Based Radiomics for Differentiating Orbital Cavernous Hemangioma and Orbital Schwannoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orbital cavernous hemangioma is the most common primary tumor in the orbit. With the development of histopathology, it has been confirmed that cavernous hemangioma is not a real tumor, but a special type of vascular malformation. Cavernous hemangioma malformation(CVM) is a more appropriate way to name it. At present, surgical resection is the main treatment for CVMs. The prognosis of the surgery mainly depends on the location and the size of the lesion as well as its relationship with the optic nerve. Therefore, effective imaging information is of great importance. This paper analyzes the radiological imaging characteristics and the advantages and disadvantages between them, including ultrasound, CT, MRI, and SPECT/CT imaging of CVMs, hoping to help improve our understanding of CVMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.