Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072520›Full record

ArticleEnergy research & social science2020

Petro-riskscapes and environmental distress in West Texas: Community perceptions of environmental degradation, threats, and loss.

Holly Elser, Sidra Goldman-Mellor, Rachel Morello-Frosch, Nicole C Deziel, Kelsey Ranjbar, Joan A Casey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Energy research & social science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Environment and Headache: a Narrative Review.Current environmental health reports · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The 2021 Texas Power Crisis: distribution, duration, and disparities.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Holly ElserStanford Medical School, Stanford Center for Population Health Sciences.
Sidra Goldman-MellorDepartment of Public Health, University of California, Merced.
Rachel Morello-FroschDepartment of Environment, Science, Policy and Management & School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Nicole C DezielDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health.
Kelsey RanjbarDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Joan A CaseyDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, Rm 1206, New York NY 10032-3727.
University of California, Berkeley · USColumbia University · USUniversity of California, Merced · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MATTHEW S PERZANOWSKI · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
The Impact of Unconventional Natural Gas Development on Maternal, Perinatal, and Childhood Health: an Electronic Health Record ApproachR00ES027023 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CASEY, JOAN A · 2019 to 2021
$747k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES027023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unconventional oil and gas development (UOGD) expanded rapidly in the United States between 2004-2019 with resultant industrial change to landscapes and new environmental exposures. By 2019, West Texas' Permian Basin accounted for 35% of domestic oil production. We conducted an online survey of 566 Texans in 2019 to examine the implications of UOGD using three measures from the Environmental Distress Scale (EDS): perceived threat of environmental issues, felt impact of environmental change, and loss of solace when valued environments are transformed ("solastalgia"). We found increased levels of environmental distress among respondents living in counties in the Permian Basin who reported a 2.75% increase in perceived threat of environmental issues (95% CI = -1.14, 6.65) and a 4.21% increase in solastalgia (95% CI = 0.03, 8.40). In our subgroup analysis of women, we found higher EDS subscale scores among respondents in Permian Basin counties for perceived threat of environmental issues (4.08%, 95% CI= -0.12, 8.37) and solastalgia (7.09%, 95% CI= 2.44, 11.88). In analysis restricted to Permian Basin counties, we found exposure to at least one earthquake of magnitude ≥ 3 was associated with increases in perceived threat of environmental issues (4.69%, 95% CI = 0.15, 9.23), and that county-level exposure to oil and gas injection wells was associated with increases in felt impact (4.38%, 95% CI = -1.77, 10.54) and solastalgia (4.06%, 95% CI = 3.02, 11.14). Our results indicate increased environmental distress in response to UOGD-related environmental degradation among Texans and highlight the importance of considering susceptible sub-groups.

Indexed as

EarthquakesHydraulic FracturingMental HealthNatural GasOil and Gas FieldsPsychologicalStress

Identifiers

PMID33072520
PMCPMC7566653
OpenAlexW3091956364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.