ArticleCureus2020
Clinicopathologic Features of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma and Their Impact on Prognosis.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 5-Methylcytosine immunohistochemistry for predicting cutaneous melanoma prognosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMelanoma ranks 19th among malignancies overall and second among cutaneous types. The incidence worldwide has been on the rise over the last seven decades. Various prognostic factors have been assessed and found to have a profound impact on patient outcome. However, no such studies have been attempted in our population. Our study aimed to have an insight into the behavior of malignant melanoma in our population. MATERIALS AND
methodsCases of cutaneous malignant melanoma treated and followed up at our institute were included in this study. Cases of mucosal and choroidal melanoma were excluded. The parameters noted were age, gender, tumor thickness, Clark level, and presence of ulceration. These parameters were individually correlated with development of distant metastasis, two-year survival, survival duration, and primary tumor and lymph node stage. Appropriate statistical analyses were done.
resultsThirty patients of cutaneous malignant melanomas were treated and followed up at our institution. There was male predilection of 1:1.5. Mean age at diagnosis was 50.1 years. Two-year survival was significantly better in females. Sun-exposed areas of the skin were most commonly involved followed by anal canal that has an unusually high incidence in our society. Majority of our cases were pT4(25) on tumor, nodal status, metastasis (TNM) staging at time of diagnosis. Increasing tumor thickness in terms of primary tumor staging was not found to have any significant impact on two-year survival, distant metastasis, lymph node stage, or survival duration. Sixty percent of cases had ulceration. There was no statistically significant effect on two-year survival (78% in ulcerated group vs 75% in nonulcerated group) and distant metastasis (61% vs 58.3%). In terms of Clark level, 20 cases were level V, seven cases were level IV, two were level III, and one was level I. There was no statistically significant difference between the Clark levels in terms of two years survival, development of distant metastasis, and lymph node stages.
conclusionMelanoma is an aggressive malignancy that causes high morbidity and morality. It commonly presents at an advanced stage at time of diagnosis in our population. Broader studies are required with early-stage melanomas to compare the various prognostic factors and their impact on prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.