Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072421›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

Do external female genital measurements affect genital perception and sexual function and orgasm?

Aşkı Ellibeş Kaya, Ozan Doğan, Murat Yassa, Alper Başbuğ, Canan Özcan, Eray Çalışkan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Labial Length and Patient Symptomatology: Is There a Correlation?Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aşkı Ellibeş KayaDüzce University Hospital, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Düzce, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1323-7416
Ozan DoğanPrivate Clinic, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-8749
Murat YassaUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8661-1192
Alper BaşbuğDüzce University Hospital, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Düzce, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-9849
Canan ÖzcanPrivate Clinic, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-6053
Eray ÇalışkanOkan University Hospital, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6799-5909
Düzce Üniversitesi · TRTurkish Society of Hematology · TROkan University · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide baseline data for the anatomy of the external female genitalia and to investigate the correlation between those measurements and sexual function and genital perception. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective cohort study consisted of 208 healthy premenopausal women. The Female Sexual Function index (FSFI) and the Female Genital Self-image scale (FGSIS) questionnaires were administered. Participants were divided into two groups according to their female sexual dysfunction (FSD) status. External genital measurements and anterior and posterior vaginal length were measured.

resultsThe external female genital measurements were (cm, mean ± standard deviation): clitoral prepuce length 2.05±0.48; clitoral glans length 0.87±0.21; clitoral glans width 0.60±0.15; clitoris to urethra 2.24±0.55; anterior fornix depth 7.75±0.92; posterior fornix depth 9.25±0.75; labia minora width, right 2.12±0.86, left 2.20±0.96. A weak negative correlation was found between total FGSIS scores and clitoral prepuce length (p=0.01, r=-0.17), whereas a weak positive correlation was seen between total FGSIS scores and anterior-posterior vaginal lengths (p=0.04, r=0.13; p=0.02, r=0.15, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the genital measurements of participants with FSD (n=82, 39.4%) and those without FSD (n=126, 60.6%), and the total FSFI scores and orgasm subdomain scores.

conclusionThe female genital measurements were found to be distributed over a wide range. Although the relationship between genital measurements and genital perception varied, no significant relationship was found between genital measurements and sexual functions or orgasm. These findings suggest that a more cautious approach should be taken towards genital surgeries for cosmetic purposes.

Indexed as

Female external genitaliagenital measurementsgenital perceptionsexual function

Identifiers

PMID33072421
PMCPMC7538817
OpenAlexW3089895214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.