Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072367›Full record

ArticleNursing open2020

Factors influencing the utilization of Focused antenatal care services during pregnancy, a study among postnatal women in a tertiary healthcare facility, Ghana.

Kennedy Diema Konlan, Joel Afram Saah, Roberta Mensima Amoah, Abdul Razak Doat, Iddrisu Mohammed, Juliana Asibi Abdulai, Kennedy Dodam Konlan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kennedy Diema KonlanDepartment of Public Health Nursing School of Nursing and Midwifery University of Health and Allied Sciences Ho Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-1994-3792
Joel Afram SaahDepartment of Public Health School of Allied Sciences University for Development Studies Tamale Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-6574-2695
Roberta Mensima AmoahDepartment of Public Health School of Allied Sciences University for Development Studies Tamale Ghana.
Abdul Razak DoatNursing and Midwifery Training College Tamale Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-4273-5243
Iddrisu MohammedNursing and Midwifery Training College Tamale Ghana.
Juliana Asibi AbdulaiSurgical Department, Urology Tamale Teaching Hospital Tamale Ghana.
Kennedy Dodam KonlanDepartment of Nursing West End University College Accra Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To assess the factors that influence the utilization of FANC services among pregnant women. Methodology: A cross-sectional quantitative study conducted among 210 postnatal women in Ho Teaching Hospital. Data were entered into Microsoft excel, cleaned and transported to SPSS and analysed. Cross tabulations were used to explore associations between variables. Results: The respondents indicated that FANC would enable them to receive comprehensive ANC (74.8%). Higher parity was significantly associated with low utilization of FANC (

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePrenatal CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHealth FacilitiesHumansParityPregnancyTertiary Health Careantenatalfactorsfocused antenatal careinfluencingmaternal healthpregnancyutilization

Identifiers

PMID33072367
PMCPMC7544877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.