Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072300›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Polyandry provides reproductive and genetic benefits in colonising populations.

Rebecca C Lewis, Michael D Pointer, Lucy A Friend, Ramakrishnan Vasudeva, James Bemrose, Andreas Sutter, Matthew J G Gage, Lewis G Spurgin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expanding insect pollinators in the Anthropocene.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca C LewisSchool of Biological Sciences Norwich Research Park University of East Anglia Norwich UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4739-0280
Michael D PointerSchool of Biological Sciences Norwich Research Park University of East Anglia Norwich UK.
Lucy A FriendSchool of Biological Sciences Norwich Research Park University of East Anglia Norwich UK.
Ramakrishnan VasudevaSchool of Biological Sciences Norwich Research Park University of East Anglia Norwich UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-0384
James BemroseSchool of Biological Sciences Norwich Research Park University of East Anglia Norwich UK.
Andreas SutterSchool of Biological Sciences Norwich Research Park University of East Anglia Norwich UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7764-3456
Matthew J G GageSchool of Biological Sciences Norwich Research Park University of East Anglia Norwich UK.
Lewis G SpurginSchool of Biological Sciences Norwich Research Park University of East Anglia Norwich UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-9281

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyandry, when females mate with more than one male, is theorised to play an important role in successful colonisation of new habitats. In addition to possible benefits from sexual selection, even mild polyandry could facilitate colonisation by protecting against inbreeding and reducing the costs of mating with incompatible or infertile males. Here, we measure the importance of mild polyandry for population viability and reproductive fitness following experimental founder events into a higher-temperature regime. Using colonisation experiments with the model beetle

Indexed as

extinctioninbreeding depressionpopulation dynamicssexual selectionTribolium

Identifiers

PMID33072300
PMCPMC7548180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.