ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2020
Myoelectric prosthesis: a potential emerging therapeutic in restoring function post-arm amputation complicated by necrotizing fasciitis.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A literature search confirmed no previous cases of an arm amputation secondary to necrotizing fasciitis (NF) being successfully treated with a myoelectric prosthesis. This report explores a case of a 55-year-old right-handed male with flexor tenosynovitis infection of the hand after a small laceration. Following infectious disease consult of the infection, a diagnosis of NF was made. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were initiated but the infection worsened after 12 hours. Two debridements with wound vacuum were undertaken in the next 48 hours. After further patient deterioration, a distal left forearm amputation was undertaken. The patient fully recovered and then underwent occupational therapy training with a myoelectric prosthesis to restore hand function. The patient was seen for follow-up 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after amputation. At 2-year follow-up, the patient was continuing rehabilitation with an occupational therapist to acclimate to the prosthesis with some gain of function in gross movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.