Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072189›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic histopathology (Oxford, England)2021

The practice of cytopathology during the era of COVID-19: challenges and changes.

Swikrity Upadhyay Baskota, Ashish Chandra, Paul Cross

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic histopathology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Swikrity Upadhyay BaskotaDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, PA, USA.Conflicts of interest: none declared.
Ashish ChandraDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, PA, USA.Conflicts of interest: none declared.
Paul CrossDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, PA, USA.Conflicts of interest: none declared.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reviews the challenges faced by cytology laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic. Various safety guidelines regarding collection, handling, transport and sampling in cytology laboratory are presented. A brief literature overview of adapted changes regarding new safety techniques, processing, sampling techniques implemented by the cytology laboratories in this part of the world is presented. The use of cytology in COVID-19 patients is discussed. The authors have also tried to present the challenges and changes faced for training and education during this time. Migration from multi-headed scope in-person sign-out to digital based platforms were adapted to continue medical education. The potential long-term implications of these adaptations on cytology services are also touched upon.

Indexed as

challengeschangescoronavirus disease-19COVID-19cytologyeducation

Identifiers

PMID33072189
PMCPMC7550117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.