Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072176›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2020

Automated discretization of 'transpiration restriction to increasing VPD' features from outdoors high-throughput phenotyping data.

Soumyashree Kar, Ryokei Tanaka, Lijalem Balcha Korbu, Jana Kholová, Hiroyoshi Iwata, Surya S Durbha, J Adinarayana, Vincent Vadez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Soumyashree KarCentre of Studies in Resources Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India 400076.
Ryokei TanakaLaboratory of Biometrics and Bioinformatics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Lijalem Balcha KorbuDebre Zeit Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Debre Zeit, Ethiopia.
Jana KholováInternational Crop Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics, Hyderabad, India 502319.
Hiroyoshi IwataLaboratory of Biometrics and Bioinformatics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Surya S DurbhaCentre of Studies in Resources Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India 400076.
J AdinarayanaCentre of Studies in Resources Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India 400076.
Vincent VadezInternational Crop Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics, Hyderabad, India 502319.ORCID 0000-0003-2014-0281
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay · INThe University of Tokyo · JPEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research · ETInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · BJInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRestricting transpiration under high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is a promising water-saving trait for drought adaptation. However, it is often measured under controlled conditions and at very low throughput, unsuitable for breeding. A few high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) studies exist, and have considered only maximum transpiration rate in analyzing genotypic differences in this trait. Further, no study has precisely identified the VPD breakpoints where genotypes restrict transpiration under natural conditions. Therefore, outdoors HTP data (15 min frequency) of a chickpea population were used to automate the generation of smooth transpiration profiles, extract informative features of the transpiration response to VPD for optimal genotypic discretization, identify VPD breakpoints, and compare genotypes.

resultsFifteen biologically relevant features were extracted from the transpiration rate profiles derived from load cells data. Genotypes were clustered (C1, C2, C3) and 6 most important features (with heritability > 0.5) were selected using unsupervised Random Forest. All the wild relatives were found in C1, while C2 and C3 mostly comprised high TE and low TE lines, respectively. Assessment of the distinct p-value groups within each selected feature revealed highest genotypic variation for the feature representing transpiration response to high VPD condition. Sensitivity analysis on a multi-output neural network model (with R of 0.931, 0.944, 0.953 for C1, C2, C3, respectively) found C1 with the highest water saving ability, that restricted transpiration at relatively low VPD levels, 56% (i.e. 3.52 kPa) or 62% (i.e. 3.90 kPa), depending whether the influence of other environmental variables was minimum or maximum. Also, VPD appeared to have the most striking influence on the transpiration response independently of other environment variable, whereas light, temperature, and relative humidity alone had little/no effect.

conclusionThrough this study, we present a novel approach to identifying genotypes with drought-tolerance potential, which overcomes the challenges in HTP of the water-saving trait. The six selected features served as proxy phenotypes for reliable genotypic discretization. The wild chickpeas were found to limit water-loss faster than the water-profligate cultivated ones. Such an analytic approach can be directly used for prescriptive breeding applications, applied to other traits, and help expedite maximized information extraction from HTP data.

Indexed as

Feature selectionGini indexHigh throughput phenotypingMachine learningNeural networkSensitivity analysisTime seriesTranspiration rateUnsupervised random-forestVapor pressure deficit

Identifiers

PMID33072176
PMCPMC7565372
OpenAlexW3093048683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.