Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072174›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2020

Evaluation of duplicated reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in genome unknown hexaploid oat (

Zheng Yang, Kai Wang, Usman Aziz, Cuizhu Zhao, Meng Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Contribution ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Oat (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterization of the Metallothionein Gene Family inAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zheng YangCollege of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100 Shaanxi China.
Kai WangCollege of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100 Shaanxi China.
Usman AzizCollege of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100 Shaanxi China.
Cuizhu ZhaoCollege of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100 Shaanxi China.
Meng ZhangCollege of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100 Shaanxi China.ORCID 0000-0002-0738-7899
North West Agriculture and Forestry University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOat (

resultsIn this study, eleven candidate RGs, including four duplicated genes, were selected from oat transcriptome. The stability and the optimal combination of these candidate RGs were assessed in 18 oat samples by using four statistical algorithms including the ΔCt method, geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper. The most stable RGs for "all samples", "shoots and roots of seedlings", "developing seeds" and "developing endosperms" were

conclusionsResults provide a proof of concept that the duplicated RG is feasible for qPCR in polyploids. To our knowledge, this study is the first systematic research on the optimal RGs for accurate qPCR normalization of gene expression in different organs and tissues of oat.

Indexed as

Duplicated geneEndospermGene expressionOatPolyploidqPCRReference gene

Identifiers

PMID33072174
PMCPMC7560290
OpenAlexW3092862529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.