Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072141›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Holocentric Karyotype Evolution in

Paula Burchardt, Christopher E Buddenhagen, Marcos L Gaeta, Murilo D Souza, André Marques, André L L Vanzela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chromosomal Instability and Chromoanagenesis as Forces for Genomic Evolution.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The genome of Eleocharis vivipara elucidates the genetics of CJournal of integrative plant biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chromosomal conservatism vs chromosomal megaevolution: enigma of karyotypic evolution in Lepidoptera.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. CMA/DAPI Banding of Plant Chromosomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paula BurchardtLaboratório de Citogenética e Diversidade Vegetal, Departamento de Biologia Geral, CCB, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.
Christopher E BuddenhagenForage Science, AgResearch Limited, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Marcos L GaetaLaboratório de Citogenética e Diversidade Vegetal, Departamento de Biologia Geral, CCB, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.
Murilo D SouzaLaboratório de Citogenética e Diversidade Vegetal, Departamento de Biologia Geral, CCB, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.
André MarquesDepartment of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
André L L VanzelaLaboratório de Citogenética e Diversidade Vegetal, Departamento de Biologia Geral, CCB, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyperaceae is a family of Monocotyledons comprised of species with holocentric chromosomes that are associated with intense dysploidy and polyploidy events. Within this family the genus

Indexed as

C-CMA/DAPI bandingchromosome numbersDNA C-valueflow cytometrykaryotype diversity

Identifiers

PMID33072141
PMCPMC7533669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.