Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33072008›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2020

Local Bacteriophage Delivery for Treatment and Prevention of Bacterial Infections.

Stijn Gerard Rotman, Eric Sumrall, Reihane Ziadlou, Dirk W Grijpma, Robert Geoff Richards, David Eglin, Thomas Fintan Moriarty

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Phage therapy againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Bacteriophage therapy for drug-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Nano/microformulations for Bacteriophage Delivery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stijn Gerard RotmanAO Research Institute Davos, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
Eric SumrallAO Research Institute Davos, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
Reihane ZiadlouAO Research Institute Davos, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
Dirk W GrijpmaMIRA Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Technical Medicine, Department of Biomaterials Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Robert Geoff RichardsAO Research Institute Davos, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
David EglinAO Research Institute Davos, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
Thomas Fintan MoriartyAO Research Institute Davos, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
AO Foundation · CHUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As viruses with high specificity for their bacterial hosts, bacteriophages (phages) are an attractive means to eradicate bacteria, and their potential has been recognized by a broad range of industries. Against a background of increasing rates of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria, bacteriophages have received much attention as a possible "last-resort" strategy to treat infections. The use of bacteriophages in human patients is limited by their sensitivity to acidic pH, enzymatic attack and short serum half-life. Loading phage within a biomaterial can shield the incorporated phage against many of these harmful environmental factors, and in addition, provide controlled release for prolonged therapeutic activity. In this review, we assess the different classes of biomaterials (i.e., biopolymers, synthetic polymers, and ceramics) that have been used for phage delivery and describe the processing methodologies that are compatible with phage embedding or encapsulation. We also elaborate on the clinical or pre-clinical data generated using these materials. While a primary focus is placed on the application of phage-loaded materials for treatment of infection, we also include studies from other translatable fields such as food preservation and animal husbandry. Finally, we summarize trends in the literature and identify current barriers that currently prevent clinical application of phage-loaded biomaterials.

Indexed as

bacteriophagebeadsembeddingencapsulationhydrogelinfectionlocal deliverysustained release

Identifiers

PMID33072008
PMCPMC7531225
OpenAlexW3087364625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.