Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33071794›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2020

COVID-19: Is There Evidence for the Use of Herbal Medicines as Adjuvant Symptomatic Therapy?

Dâmaris Silveira, Jose Maria Prieto-Garcia, Fabio Boylan, Omar Estrada, Yris Maria Fonseca-Bazzo, Claudia Masrouah Jamal, Pérola Oliveira Magalhães, Edson Oliveira Pereira, Michal Tomczyk, Michael Heinrich

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
39.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 273 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Antiviral Activity of Medicinal Plant ExtractsPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Dâmaris SilveiraDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
Jose Maria Prieto-GarciaSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Fabio BoylanSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Omar EstradaBiophysics and Biochemistry Center, Venezuelan Institute of Scientific Research, Caracas, Venezuela.
Yris Maria Fonseca-BazzoDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
Claudia Masrouah JamalCenter of Health Sciences, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
Pérola Oliveira MagalhãesDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
Edson Oliveira PereiraDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
Michal TomczykFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Michael HeinrichPharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, School of Pharmacy, University College of London, London, United Kingdom.
Universidade de Brasília · BRInstituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas · VELiverpool John Moores University · GBMedical University of Białystok · PLTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent recommendations for the self-management of SARS-Cov-2 disease (COVID-19) include self-isolation, rest, hydration, and the use of NSAID in case of high fever only. It is expected that many patients will add other symptomatic/adjuvant treatments, such as herbal medicines.

aimsTo provide a benefits/risks assessment of selected herbal medicines traditionally indicated for "respiratory diseases" within the current frame of the COVID-19 pandemic as an adjuvant treatment.

methodThe plant selection was primarily based on species listed by the WHO and EMA, but some other herbal remedies were considered due to their widespread use in respiratory conditions. Preclinical and clinical data on their efficacy and safety were collected from authoritative sources. The target population were adults with early and mild flu symptoms without underlying conditions. These were evaluated according to a modified PrOACT-URL method with paracetamol, ibuprofen, and codeine as reference drugs. The benefits/risks balance of the treatments was classified as

resultsA total of 39 herbal medicines were identified as very likely to appeal to the COVID-19 patient. According to our method, the benefits/risks assessment of the herbal medicines was found to be positive in 5 cases (

conclusionsOur work suggests that several herbal medicines have safety margins superior to those of reference drugs and enough levels of evidence to start a clinical discussion about their potential use as adjuvants in the treatment of early/mild common flu in otherwise healthy adults within the context of COVID-19. While these herbal medicines will not cure or prevent the flu, they may both improve general patient well-being and offer them an opportunity to personalize the therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

benefit/risk assessmentcoronavirus (2019-nCoV)COVID-19herbal medicinerespiratory diseases

Identifiers

PMID33071794
PMCPMC7542597
OpenAlexW3088361581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.