Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33071765›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2020

Oscillatory Bursting as a Mechanism for Temporal Coupling and Information Coding.

Idan Tal, Samuel Neymotin, Stephan Bickel, Peter Lakatos, Charles E Schroeder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Temporal codes and recurrent timing nets for rhythmic expectancy.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Spatial Reach of Neuronal Coherence and Spike-Field Coupling across the Human Neocortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Reading and Modulating Cortical β Bursts from Motor Unit Spiking Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Idan TalDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Samuel NeymotinTranslational Neuroscience Division, Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, New York, NY, United States.
Stephan BickelTranslational Neuroscience Division, Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, New York, NY, United States.
Peter LakatosTranslational Neuroscience Division, Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, New York, NY, United States.
Charles E SchroederDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

Project 5: ComputationalP50MH109429 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI Robert Thomas Knight · 2017 to 2026
$25.3M
Cortical and thalamic mechanisms of selective auditory attentionR01DC012947 · NIDCD · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI NEYMOTIN, SAMUEL A, SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2013 to 2022
$5.2M
Defining Neuronal Circuits and Cellular Processes Underlying Resting fMRI SignalsR01MH111439 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER, SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2016 to 2020
$5.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012947NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH109429NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even the simplest cognitive processes involve interactions between cortical regions. To study these processes, we usually rely on averaging across several repetitions of a task or across long segments of data to reach a statistically valid conclusion. Neuronal oscillations reflect synchronized excitability fluctuations in ensembles of neurons and can be observed in electrophysiological recordings in the presence or absence of an external stimulus. Oscillatory brain activity has been viewed as sustained increase in power at specific frequency bands. However, this perspective has been challenged in recent years by the notion that oscillations may occur as transient burst-like events that occur in individual trials and may only appear as sustained activity when multiple trials are averaged together. In this review, we examine the idea that oscillatory activity can manifest as a transient burst as well as a sustained increase in power. We discuss the technical challenges involved in the detection and characterization of transient events at the single trial level, the mechanisms that might generate them and the features that can be extracted from these events to study single-trial dynamics of neuronal ensemble activity.

Indexed as

burstsmethodsoscillationssingle trialtimingtransients

Identifiers

PMID33071765
PMCPMC7533591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.