Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33071644›Full record

ArticleReproductive medicine and biology2020

Cutting the ovarian surface improves the responsiveness to exogenous hormonal treatment in aged mice.

Takashi Umehara, Nao Urabe, Toshiki Obata, Takashi Yamaguchi, Atsushi Tanaka, Masayuki Shimada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Accumulation of senescent cells in the stroma of aged mouse ovary.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takashi UmeharaGraduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life Hiroshima University Higashi-Hiroshima Japan.
Nao UrabeSaint Mother Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic Institute for ART Fukuoka Japan.
Toshiki ObataSaint Mother Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic Institute for ART Fukuoka Japan.
Takashi YamaguchiSaint Mother Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic Institute for ART Fukuoka Japan.
Atsushi TanakaSaint Mother Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic Institute for ART Fukuoka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5299-2505
Masayuki ShimadaGraduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life Hiroshima University Higashi-Hiroshima Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6500-2088
Ono Clinic · JPHiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOvarian vascular abnormality and ovarian fibrosis are observed in the low responder patients and aging mice. Vascularization and fibrosis are regulated by injury-repair system, such as wound. Thus, in this study, the authors tried to investigate the effect of the surgical treatment to ovarian surface with cutting on the functions of ovary in aging mouse model, gc

methodThe ovarian surface of gc

resultOvarian fibrosis disappeared at 7 days after surgery. With the abrogation of fibrosis, the blood vessels were fluently observed around the follicles, and the follicular development was re-started. The responses against exogenous hormone were recovered at 21 days after the surgery, and estrous cycle and delivery were also recovered by the surgery and the fertility was maintained for 3 months.

conclusionThis cutting method of ovarian surface becomes a good option against low responder patients.

Indexed as

angiogenesiscontrol ovarian stimulationcutting the ovarian surfacelow responderovarian fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID33071644
PMCPMC7542011
OpenAlexW3080123062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.