ReviewCurrent genomics2020
Recent Development of Machine Learning Methods in Microbial Phosphorylation Sites.
Review in Current genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of Machine Learning and Algorithmic Methods for Protein Phosphorylation Site Prediction.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Review
- Identification of phosphorylation site using S-padding strategy based convolutional neural network.Health information science and systems · 2022Article
- An Improved Computational Prediction Model for Lysine Succinylation Sites Mapping onCurrent genomics · 2021Article
- ProIn-Fuse: improved and robust prediction of proinflammatory peptides by fusing of multiple feature representations.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A variety of protein post-translational modifications has been identified that control many cellular functions. Phosphorylation studies in mycobacterial organisms have shown critical importance in diverse biological processes, such as intercellular communication and cell division. Recent technical advances in high-precision mass spectrometry have determined a large number of microbial phosphorylated proteins and phosphorylation sites throughout the proteome analysis. Identification of phosphorylated proteins with specific modified residues through experimentation is often labor-intensive, costly and time-consuming. All these limitations could be overcome through the application of machine learning (ML) approaches. However, only a limited number of computational phosphorylation site prediction tools have been developed so far. This work aims to present a complete survey of the existing ML-predictors for microbial phosphorylation. We cover a variety of important aspects for developing a successful predictor, including operating ML algorithms, feature selection methods, window size, and software utility. Initially, we review the currently available phosphorylation site databases of the microbiome, the state-of-the-art ML approaches, working principles, and their performances. Lastly, we discuss the limitations and future directions of the computational ML methods for the prediction of phosphorylation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.