Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33071483›Full record

ArticleCurrent directions in psychological science2020

Beyond the Core-Deficit Hypothesis in Developmental Disorders.

Duncan E Astle, Sue Fletcher-Watson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current directions in psychological science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07544199 (Transdiagnostic Dimensional Profiling of Neurodevelopmental Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07544199 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Transdiagnostic Dimensional Profiling of Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Using a Digital Platform to Assess Domain-General and Domain Specific Cognitive Functions

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIRCCS Eugenio MedeaRan2026 to 2030Enrolled300ConditionsNeurodevelopmental Disorder (Diagnosis)ArmsNeuropsychological assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Narrative abilities of autistic and non-autistic adolescents: The role of mentalising and executive function.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  14. Revisiting the definition of dyslexia.Annals of dyslexia · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Duncan E AstleMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7042-5392
Sue Fletcher-WatsonSalvesen Mindroom Research Centre, The University of Edinburgh.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental disorders and childhood learning difficulties encompass complex constellations of relative strengths and weaknesses across multiple aspects of learning, cognition, and behavior. Historically, debate in developmental psychology has been focused largely on the existence and nature of core deficits-the shared mechanistic origin from which all observed profiles within a diagnostic category emerge. The pitfalls of this theoretical approach have been articulated multiple times, but reductionist, core-deficit accounts remain remarkably prevalent. They persist because developmental science still follows the methodological template that accompanies core-deficit theories-highly selective samples, case-control designs, and voxel-wise neuroimaging methods. Fully moving beyond "core-deficit" thinking will require more than identifying its theoretical flaws. It will require a wholesale rethink about the way we design, collect, and analyze developmental data.

Indexed as

cognitive developmentdevelopmental disordersdevelopmental psychologydevelopmental science

Identifiers

PMID33071483
PMCPMC7539596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.