Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33071284›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2021

Impact of age on sorafenib outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma: an international cohort study.

Saur Hajiev, Elias Allara, Leila Motedayеn Aval, Tadaaki Arizumi, Dominik Bettinger, Mario Pirisi, Lorenza Rimassa, Tiziana Pressiani, Nicola Personeni, Laura Giordano and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. NJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of older age in patients receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. How to Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Saur Hajiev *Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Elias Allara *Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Leila Motedayеn AvalDivision of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Tadaaki ArizumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Dominik BettingerDepartment of Medicine II, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Mario PirisiDepartment of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Lorenza RimassaMedical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Milan), Italy.
Tiziana PressianiMedical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Milan), Italy.
Nicola PersoneniMedical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Milan), Italy.
Laura GiordanoMedical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (Milan), Italy.
Masatoshi KudoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Robert ThimmeDepartment of Medicine II, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Joong-Won ParkNational Cancer Centre Hospital, Goyang, South Korea.
Tamar H TaddeiUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David E KaplanUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ramya RamaswamiDivision of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
David J PinatoDivision of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Rohini SharmaDivision of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. r.sharma@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2441-549X
Hammersmith Hospital · GBHumanitas University · ITKindai University · JPUniversity of Pennsylvania · USNational Cancer Center · KRUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no consensus on the effect of sorafenib dosing on efficacy and toxicity in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Older patients are often empirically started on low-dose therapy with the aim to avoid toxicities while maximising clinical efficacy. We aimed to verify whether age impacts on overall survival (OS) and whether a reduced starting dose impacts on OS or toxicity experienced by the elderly.

methodsIn an international, multicentre cohort study, outcomes for those aged <75 or ≥75 years were determined while accounting for common prognostic factors and demographic characteristics in univariable and multivariable models.

resultsFive thousand five hundred and ninety-eight patients were recruited; 792 (14.1%) were aged ≥75 years. The elderly were more likely to have larger tumours (>7 cm) (39 vs 33%, p < 0.01) with preserved liver function (67 vs 57.7%) (p < 0.01). No difference in the median OS of those aged ≥75 years and <75 was noted (7.3 months vs 7.2 months; HR 1.00 (95% CI 0.93-1.08), p = 0.97). There was no relationship between starting dose of sorafenib 800 mg vs 400 mg/200 mg and OS between those <75 and ≥75 years. The elderly experienced a similar overall incidence of grade 2-4 sorafenib-related toxicity compared to <75 years (63.5 vs 56.7%, p = 0.11). However, the elderly were more likely to discontinue sorafenib due to toxicity (27.0 vs 21.6%, p < 0.01). This did not vary between different starting doses of sorafenib.

conclusionsClinical outcomes in the elderly is equivalent to patients aged <75 years, independent of dose of sorafenib prescribed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSorafenibTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID33071284
PMCPMC7852559
OpenAlexW3092675148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.