ArticleExperimental animals2021
Comparison of the anatomical morphology of cervical vertebrae between humans and macaques: related to a spinal cord injury model.
Article in Experimental animals, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Animal Models of Spinal Cord Injury.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-human primates are most suitable for generating cervical experimental models, and it is necessary to study the anatomy of the cervical spine in non-human primates when generating the models. The purpose of this study was to provide the anatomical parameters of the cervical spine and spinal cord in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) as a basis for cervical spine-related experimental studies. Cervical spine specimens from 8 male adult subjects were scanned by micro-computed tomography, and an additional 10 live male subjects were scanned by magnetic resonance imaging. The measurements and parameters from them were compared to those of 12 male adult human subjects. Additionally, 10 live male subjects were scanned by magnetic resonance imaging, and the width and depth of the spinal cord and spinal canal and the thickness of the anterior and posterior cerebrospinal fluid were measured and compared to the relevant parameters of 10 male adult human subjects. The tendency of cervical parameters to change with segmental changes was similar between species. The vertebral body, spinal canal, and spinal cord were significantly flatter in the human subjects than in the long-tailed macaques. The cerebrospinal fluid space in the long-tailed macaques was smaller than that in the human subjects. The anatomical features of the cervical vertebrae of long-tailed macaques provide a reference for establishing a preclinical model of cervical spinal cord injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.