Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33071108›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology2021

Site of metastatic recurrence impacts prognosis in patients with high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Joseph G Cheaib, Lauren E Claus, Hiten D Patel, Max R Kates, Andres Matoso, Noah M Hahn, Trinity J Bivalacqua, Jean H Hoffman-Censits, Phillip M Pierorazio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joseph G CheaibDepartment of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: jcheaib1@jhu.edu.
Lauren E ClausDepartment of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Hiten D PatelDepartment of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL.
Max R KatesDepartment of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Andres MatosoDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Noah M HahnDepartment of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Trinity J BivalacquaDepartment of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jean H Hoffman-CensitsDepartment of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Phillip M PierorazioDepartment of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMetastatic recurrence occurs in over 25% of upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. While metastatic recurrence suggests poor prognosis, the impact of the specific site of recurrence on prognosis is not well documented. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 188 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for high-grade, node-negative upper tract urothelial carcinoma at our institution from 2003 to 2018 without receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Competing-risks survival analysis was performed to evaluate the cumulative incidence and predictors of metastatic recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate and compare recurrence site-specific survival probabilities following metastatic recurrence. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess site-specific prognoses.

resultsOf the 188 patients, 47 (25%) developed metastatic recurrence over a median follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range: 10.5-58.5 months). The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidences of metastatic recurrence were 13.6% and 23.6%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, lymphovascular invasion was significantly predictive of metastatic recurrence (subhazard ratio: 2.6, P = 0.01). Of the 47 patients who developed recurrence, 38 (80.9%) died over a median follow-up of 10 months (interquartile range: 5-20 months). Metastatic recurrence was most common in the lungs (n= 13, 28%) and at multiple sites (n= 14, 30%). Median time to recurrence was shorter for recurrences at multiple sites (6.5 months) and those in the liver (13 months) and bone (18 months) compared to other sites. Patients who recurred in the liver (hazard ratio: 6.3, P = 0.007), bone (hazard ratio: 4.9, P = 0.02), and multiple sites (hazard ratio: 4.6, P = 0.01) had significantly worse prognosis compared to those who recurred in lymph nodes. Statistical significance persisted after adjusting for treatment with salvage therapy.

conclusionsA significant proportion of high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients recur systemically after radical nephroureterectomy. Lymphovascular invasion is a predictor of metastatic recurrence and may inform decisions regarding perioperative chemotherapy. Hepatic and osseous recurrences have relatively quicker onset and less favorable prognosis compared to other sites. These findings may benefit future efforts to develop recurrence site-specific treatment plans and highlight the necessity of subsequent endeavors to explore the genetic associations of recurrence in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Indexed as

NephroureterectomyAgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesUreteral NeoplasmsCarcinomaNeoplasm metastasisPrognosisRecurrenceTransitional cellUreteral neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.