Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33071098›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2020

Variation in opioid analgesia administration and discharge prescribing for emergency department patients with suspected urolithiasis.

Anna E Wentz, Ralph R C Wang, Brandon D L Marshall, Theresa I Shireman, Tao Liu, Roland C Merchant

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna E WentzBrown University School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Box G-121-3, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Electronic address: a_wentz@brown.edu.
Ralph R C WangEmergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: Ralph.Wang@ucsf.edu.
Brandon D L MarshallBrown University School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: brandon_marshall@brown.edu.
Theresa I ShiremanBrown University School of Public Health, Health Services Policy & Practice, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: theresa_shireman@brown.edu.
Tao LiuBrown University School of Public Health, Data & Statistics Core of Brown Alcohol Research Center on HIV (ARCH), Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: tliu@stat.brown.edu.
Roland C MerchantHarvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: rmerchant@bwh.harvard.edu.
Brown University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

RCT of US versus CT for Patients in the ED with Suspected Renal ColicR01HS019312 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SMITH-BINDMAN, REBECCA · 2010 to 2010
$9.2M
Long-Term Pain And Opioid Analgesic Use For Urolithiasis In The STONE TrialF31DK124898 · NIDDK · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WENTZ, ANNA · 2019 to 2020
$91k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS019312NIDDK NIH HHS F31 DK124898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrevious research has suggested caution about opioid analgesic usage in the emergency department (ED) setting and raised concerns about variations in prescription opioid analgesic usage, both across institutions and for whom they are prescribed. We examined opioid analgesic usage in ED patients with suspected urolithiasis across fifteen participating hospitals.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a clinical trial including adult ED patients with suspected urolithiasis. In multilevel models accounting for clustering by hospital, we assessed demographic, clinical, state-level, and hospital-level factors associated with opioid analgesic administration during the ED visit and prescription at discharge.

resultsOf 2352 participants, 67% received an opioid analgesic during the ED visit and 61% were prescribed one at discharge. Opioid analgesic usage varied greatly across hospitals, ranging from 46% to 88% (during visit) and 34% to 85% (at discharge). Hispanic patients were less likely than non-Hispanic white patients to receive opioid analgesics during the ED visit (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.94). Patients with higher education (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.59), health insurance coverage (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02-1.60), or receiving care in states with a prescription drug monitoring program (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.06-2.53) were more likely to receive an opioid analgesic prescription at ED discharge.

conclusionWe found marked hospital-level differences in opioid analgesic administration and prescribing, as well as associations with education, healthcare insurance, and race/ethnicity groups. These data might compel clinicians and hospitals to examine their opioid use practices to ensure it is congruent with accepted medical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePractice Patterns, Physicians'UrolithiasisAnalgesics, OpioidAcute painEmergency departmentsOpioid epidemicOpioid prescribingUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID33071098
PMCPMC7704692
OpenAlexW3041714818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.