Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33070738›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Selfish genetic elements and male fertility.

Rudi L Verspoor, Tom A R Price, Nina Wedell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. All Properties of Infertility Microbiome in a Review Article.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A meiotic driver alters sperm form and function in house mice: a possible example of spite.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Within-ejaculate sperm competition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Fifty years of sperm competition: the structure of a scientific revolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rudi L VerspoorInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Tom A R PriceInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Nina WedellBiosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selfish genetic elements (SGEs) are diverse and near ubiquitous in Eukaryotes and can be potent drivers of evolution. Here, we discuss SGEs that specifically act on sperm to gain a transmission advantage to the next generation. The diverse SGEs that affect sperm often impose costs on carrier males, including damaging ejaculates, skewing offspring sex ratios and in particular reducing sperm-competitive success of SGE-carrying males. How males and females tolerate and mitigate against these costs is a dynamic and expanding area of research. The intense intra-genomic conflict that these selfish elements generate could also have implications for male fertility and spermatogenesis more widely. This article is part of the theme issue 'Fifty years of sperm competition'.

Indexed as

AnimalsFertilityHumansMaleRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSpermatozoameiotic drivepolyandrysperm competitionWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID33070738
PMCPMC7661447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.