Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33070728›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Baculum shape and paternity success in house mice: evidence for genital coevolution.

Goncalo I André, Renée C Firman, Leigh W Simmons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fifty years of sperm competition: the structure of a scientific revolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Baculum shape and paternity success in house mice: evidence for genital coevolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Of mice and women: advances in mammalian sperm competition with a focus on the female perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Goncalo I AndréCentre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences (M092), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009 Western Australia, Australia.
Renée C FirmanCentre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences (M092), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009 Western Australia, Australia.
Leigh W SimmonsCentre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences (M092), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, 6009 Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual selection is believed to be responsible for the rapid divergence of male genitalia, which is a widely observed phenomenon across different taxa. Among mammals, the stimulatory role of male genitalia and female 'sensory perception' has been suggested to explain these evolutionary patterns. Recent research on house mice has shown that baculum (penis bone) shape can respond to experimentally imposed sexual selection. Here, we explore the adaptive value of baculum shape by performing two experiments that examine the effects of male and female genitalia on male reproductive success. Thus, we selected house mice (

Indexed as

Biological CoevolutionPaternityAnimalsBone and BonesMaleMicePeniscryptic female choiceos penissexual conflictsexual selectionsperm competition

Identifiers

PMID33070728
PMCPMC7661450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.