ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Demographic, Regional, and State-Level Trends of Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis in United States, 2008 to 2018.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rising mortality from electrolyte and acid-base imbalances in the United States (1999-2020): a joinpoint regression analysis of national trends and disparities.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Valvular Heart Disease Associations With Cardiac Biomarkers Using AI-Guided Echocardiography: The RURAL Cohort Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Demographics and Trends of Sudden Cardiac Death-Related Mortality in the United States, 1999 to 2022.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Valvular Heart Disease Associations with Cardiac Biomarkers Using AI-guided Echocardiography: the RURAL Cohort Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Concurrent aortic stenosis and hypertension: mortality trends in US older adults from 1999-2020.Future cardiology · 2025Article
- Demographic Factors and Aortic Stenosis-Related Death Locations: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Procedural Complications and Inpatient Outcomes of Leadless Pacemaker Implantations in Rural Versus Urban Hospitals in the United States.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk of supranormal left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with aortic stenosis.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
- Temporal Trends in Parkinson's Disease Related Mortality from 1999-2020: A National Analysis.NIHR open research · 2024Article
- Trends in Infective Endocarditis Mortality in the United States: 1999 to 2020: A Cause for Alarm.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Demographic and Regional Trends of Mortality in Patients With Aortic Dissection in the United States, 1999 to 2019.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Stroke-Related Mortality in the United States-Mexico Border Area of the United States, 1999 to 2018.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Aortic stenosis-related mortality might vary across demographic subsets, regions, and states in the United States. Methods and Results We reviewed the death certificate data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging OnLine Data for Epidemiologic Research database to examine aortic stenosis-related mortality trends from 2008 to 2018. Crude and age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100 000 people and annual percentage change with 95% CIs were calculated. Between 2008 and 2018, AAMR reduced from 12.7 to 11.5 (average annual percentage change, -1.0 [95% CI, -1.5 to -0.5]), because of an accelerated decline between 2015 and 2018 (annual percentage change, -4.4 [95% CI, -6.0 to -2.7]). Older (aged >85 years), male, and White patients had higher death rates than younger, female, and non-White patients, respectively. Although mortality reduction was similar across sexes, significant mortality reduction was limited to White patients only. The AAMRs were higher in rural than urban areas. States with AAMRs >90th percentile were distributed in the West and the Northeast, and <10th percentile in the South. The AAMRs for sex and race were highest in the West and lowest in the South. None of the states located in the Midwest showed a significant reduction in mortality. Mortality remained stable for hospital setting and nursing home/long-term care facility, except that the number of deaths increased at home and hospice facility since 2014. Conclusions The reduction in mortality in patients with aortic stenosis was not consistent among demographic subsets and states. The substantial public health and economic implications call for determination of underlying clinical and socioeconomic factors to narrow the gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.