Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33070675›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Demographic, Regional, and State-Level Trends of Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis in United States, 2008 to 2018.

Safi U Khan, Ankur Kalra, Samir R Kapadia, Muhammad U Khan, Muhammad Zia Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Mamas A Mamas, Haider J Warraich, Khurram Nasir, Erin D Michos and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Safi U KhanDepartment of Medicine West Virginia University Morgantown WV.
Ankur KalraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH.
Samir R KapadiaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH.
Muhammad U KhanDepartment of Medicine West Virginia University Morgantown WV.
Muhammad Zia KhanDepartment of Medicine West Virginia University Morgantown WV.
Muhammad Shahzeb KhanDepartment of Medicine John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County Chicago IL.
Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group Keele University Stoke-on-Trent UK.
Haider J WarraichHeart and Vascular Center Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston MA.
Khurram NasirDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center Houston TX.
Erin D MichosDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Mohamad AlkhouliDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Aortic stenosis-related mortality might vary across demographic subsets, regions, and states in the United States. Methods and Results We reviewed the death certificate data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging OnLine Data for Epidemiologic Research database to examine aortic stenosis-related mortality trends from 2008 to 2018. Crude and age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100 000 people and annual percentage change with 95% CIs were calculated. Between 2008 and 2018, AAMR reduced from 12.7 to 11.5 (average annual percentage change, -1.0 [95% CI, -1.5 to -0.5]), because of an accelerated decline between 2015 and 2018 (annual percentage change, -4.4 [95% CI, -6.0 to -2.7]). Older (aged >85 years), male, and White patients had higher death rates than younger, female, and non-White patients, respectively. Although mortality reduction was similar across sexes, significant mortality reduction was limited to White patients only. The AAMRs were higher in rural than urban areas. States with AAMRs >90th percentile were distributed in the West and the Northeast, and <10th percentile in the South. The AAMRs for sex and race were highest in the West and lowest in the South. None of the states located in the Midwest showed a significant reduction in mortality. Mortality remained stable for hospital setting and nursing home/long-term care facility, except that the number of deaths increased at home and hospice facility since 2014. Conclusions The reduction in mortality in patients with aortic stenosis was not consistent among demographic subsets and states. The substantial public health and economic implications call for determination of underlying clinical and socioeconomic factors to narrow the gap.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisDemographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsSurvival RateUnited Statesaortic stenosisepidemiologymortality

Identifiers

PMID33070675
PMCPMC7763421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.