Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33070582›Full record

Trial reportKorean journal of anesthesiology2021

Endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery in the lateral position: a comparison between the intubating video stylet and fiberoptic intubating bronchoscopy.

Amr Samir Wahdan, Nesrine Abdel Rahman El-Refai, Sohaila Hussien Omar, Shady Amr Abdel Moneem, Mennatallah Magdi Mohamed, Mohamed Mahmoud Hussien

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06459167 (Position Intervention to Reduce Hypoxemia in Sedation Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06459167 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Position Intervention to Reduce Hypoxemia in Sedation Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled1,752ConditionsHypoxemia, Sedation Complication, Emergencies, Airway RemodelingArmsThe position adopted when patients undergoing procedure or surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amr Samir WahdanDepartment of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nesrine Abdel Rahman El-RefaiDepartment of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Sohaila Hussien OmarDepartment of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU and Pain Management, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Shady Amr Abdel MoneemDepartment of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU and Pain Management, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Mennatallah Magdi MohamedDepartment of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed Mahmoud HussienDepartment of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU and Pain Management, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Cairo University · EGTheodor Bilharz Research Institute · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome situations compel anesthetists to execute endotracheal intubation in the lateral position. We compared elective endotracheal intubation in the lateral decubitus position using the video stylet (VS) device with the fiberoptic (FO) bronchoscope device in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

methodsOverall, 50 patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized study. They were randomly classified into the VS intubation or FO intubating bronchoscope group. After anesthesia induction, patients were placed in the lateral decubitus position, and a single investigator well-versed with the use of the VS and FO bronchoscope performed the intubation. The primary outcome was the time taken for intubation. Secondary outcomes included the intubation success rate, hemodynamic response at specific time points and perioperative complications.

resultsThe average time taken for intubation was significantly lesser in the VS group than in the FO group, with values of 39.5 ± 10.0 and 75.6 ± 16.2 s, respectively (P < 0.001). Incidences of a successful first attempt of intubation in the VS and FO groups were 88% and 100%, respectively, showing no significant difference. There was a negligible difference in complications between the groups, except sore throat, which showed a higher incidence in the VS group than in the FO group (P = 0.002).

conclusionsIn laterally positioned patients, elective endotracheal intubation with VS provides less intubation time; however, its use is accompanied by a significant increase in the hemodynamic response after intubation and an increased incidence of sore throat.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyPharyngitisAnesthesia, GeneralBronchoscopesHumansIntubation, IntratrachealAirway managementBronchoscopeIntratracheal intubationLaparotomyPatient PositioningVideo stylet

Identifiers

PMID33070582
PMCPMC8175876
OpenAlexW3093435885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.