Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33070560›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2021

External Validation of the Long Short-Term Memory Artificial Neural Network-Based SCaP Survival Calculator for Prediction of Prostate Cancer Survival.

Bumjin Lim, Kwang Suk Lee, Young Hwa Lee, Suah Kim, Choongki Min, Ju-Young Park, Hye Sun Lee, Jin Seon Cho, Sun Il Kim, Byung Ha Chung and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bumjin LimDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kwang Suk LeeDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young Hwa LeeDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Suah KimSelvas AI, Seoul, Korea.
Choongki MinSelvas AI, Seoul, Korea.
Ju-Young ParkBiostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Hye Sun LeeBiostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Seon ChoDepartment of Urology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Sun Il KimDepartment of Urology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Byung Ha ChungDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Choung-Soo KimDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyo Chul KooDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Gangnam Severance Hospital Prostate Cancer Center Research Committee 7523110National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1F1A1073833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDecision-making for treatment of newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) is complex due to the multiple initial treatment modalities available. We aimed to externally validate the SCaP (Severance Study Group of Prostate Cancer) Survival Calculator that incorporates a long short-term memory artificial neural network (ANN) model to estimate survival outcomes of PCa according to initial treatment modality. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe validation cohort consisted of clinicopathological data of 4,415 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven PCa between April 2005 and November 2018 at three institutions. Area under the curves (AUCs) and time-to-event calibration plots were utilized to determine the predictive accuracies of the SCaP Survival Calculator in terms of progression to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC)-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

resultsExcellent discrimination was observed for CRPC-free survival, CSS, and OS outcomes, with AUCs of 0.962, 0.944, and 0.884 for 5-year outcomes and 0.959, 0.928, and 0.854 for 10-year outcomes, respectively. The AUC values were higher for all survival endpoints compared to those of the development cohort. Calibration plots showed that predicted probabilities of 5-year survival endpoints had concordance comparable to those of the observed frequencies. However, calibration performances declined for 10-year predictions with an overall underestimation.

conclusionThe SCaP Survival Calculator is a reliable and useful tool for determining the optimal initial treatment modality and for guiding survival predictions for patients with newly diagnosed PCa. Further modifications in the ANN model incorporating cases with more extended follow-up periods are warranted to improve the ANN model for long-term predictions.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAgedDecision MakingHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisDecision support techniquesExternal validationProstatic neoplasmsSurvival

Identifiers

PMID33070560
PMCPMC8053858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.