Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33070556›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2021

Effect of Combining EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Cytotoxic Agents on Cholangiocarcinoma Cells.

Boonyakorn Boonsri, Kiren Yacqub-Usman, Pakpoom Thintharua, Kyaw Zwar Myint, Thannicha Sae-Lao, Pam Collier, Chinnawut Suriyonplengsaeng, Noppadol Larbcharoensub, Brinda Balasubramanian, Simran Venkatraman and 11 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Integrin αvβ3 is a Potential Therapeutic Target in Cholangiocarcinoma.International journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Combination Therapies for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Boonyakorn BoonsriDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kiren Yacqub-UsmanDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Pakpoom ThintharuaDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kyaw Zwar MyintDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thannicha Sae-LaoDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Siam University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pam CollierDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Chinnawut SuriyonplengsaengDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Noppadol LarbcharoensubDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Brinda BalasubramanianMolecular Medicine Program, Multidisciplinary Unit, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Simran VenkatramanMolecular Medicine Program, Multidisciplinary Unit, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Isioma U EgbuniweDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Dhanwant GomezDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, and NIHR Nottingham Digestive Disease Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Abhik MukherjeeDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Supeecha KumkateDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tavan JanvilisriDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abed M ZaitounDepartment of Cellular Pathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Thiti KuakpaetoonDepartment of Pathology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rutaiwan TohtongDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anna M GrabowskaDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
David O BatesDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, Centre for Cancer Sciences, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kanokpan WongprasertDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mahidol University · THUniversity of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit · GBRajavithi Hospital · THSiam University · TH

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N01247X/1National Research Council of ThailandNewton Fund DBG 5980006Newton Fund MR/N01247X/1Rajavithi Hospital Research FundThailand Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe potential of members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (ErbB) family as drug targets in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has not been extensively addressed. Although phase III clinical trials showed no survival benefits of erlotinib in patients with advanced CCA, the outcome of the standard-of-care chemotherapy treatment for CCA, gemcitabine/cisplatin, is discouraging so we determined the effect of other ErbB receptor inhibitors alone or in conjunction with chemotherapy in CCA cells. MATERIALS AND

methodsErbB receptor expression was determined in CCA patient tissues by immunohistochemistry and digital-droplet polymerase chain reaction, and in primary cells and cell lines by immunoblot. Effects on cell viability and cell cycle distribution of combination therapy using ErbB inhibitors with chemotherapeutic drugs was carried out in CCA cell lines. 3D culture of primary CCA cells was then adopted to evaluate the drug effect in a setting that more closely resembles in vivo cell environments.

resultsCCA tumors showed higher expression of all ErbB receptors compared with resection margins. Primary and CCA cell lines had variable expression of erbB receptors. CCA cell lines showed decreased cell viability when treated with chemotherapeutic drugs (gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil) but also with ErbB inhibitors, particularly afatinib, and with a combination. Sequential treatment of gemcitabine with afatinib was particularly effective. Co-culture of CCA primary cells with cancer-associated fibroblasts decreased sensitivity to chemotherapies, but sensitized to afatinib.

conclusionAfatinib is a potential epidermal growth factor receptor targeted drug for CCA treatment and sequential treatment schedule of gemcitabine and afatinib could be explored in CCA patients.

Indexed as

CholangiocarcinomaCytotoxinsHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsCytotoxinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAfatinibAntineoplastic agentsCholangiocarcinomaErbB receptorsErbB targeted drugsGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID33070556
PMCPMC8053863
OpenAlexW3091858153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.